• The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
    Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
    Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.

  • Today marks the 24th anniversary of 9/11. I pray that this nation does not forget the loss of lives from this horrible event. Yesterday conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was murdered, and I worry about what is to come. Please love one another and your family in these trying times - Spark

The 20 Best Knives Ever Made

I would most certainly delete the Lone Wolf Harsey T3 Ranger in favor of the Al Mar SERE 2000. When it comes to large survival folders the Al Mar SERE is still one of the originals and still one of the best.
 
LOL I noticed that there wasn't a Spyderco, CRK, Strider, Hinderer or ZT in the bunch. Mostly fixed blades.

And it's only one guys' opinion anyway. While I think the Buck 110 has been a popular and enduring model, I certainly wouldn't rate it as one of the top knives of all time.
 
Add: Busse TGLB and Spyderco PM2/Military. It also needs an Axis lock on there somewhere.

I'd delete the Swiss Champ but replace it with a more "normal" Victorinox. I haven't heard of a bunch of the other knives on the list...
 
Woodsman's Pal is a piece of crap, at least in its stock form.

Lists are goofy, this one is pretty arbitrary.
 
Almost the whole list is bunk IMO. Looks to me like, for the most part, it's based on history and how "nice" the knives are rather than performance. I want a list based on cutting power, edge retention, ease of sharpening, handle ergonomics, strength, piercing ability, how well the knife suits the maker's intended role overall, and other intrinsic qualities.

I have a Buck 110 and a SwissChamp. I love them. But I can't tell you with a straight face that they couldn't be improved or that improved versions don't already exist.
 
Utter nonsense from the outset. It makes no sense whatsoever to have styles like "the ulu" and "the leuku" and "the Nessmu" mixed in there with specific models.

Some ulus are garbage. Some aren't. It's like having:

Greatest Basebal Players of All Time
1) Babe Ruth
2) Pitchers
3) Ty Cobb
.
.
.

Silly.
 
"The Leuku." :D The leuku over there on top of that tool box?

Which leuku? The one I borrowed from my neighbor last week? I saw a nicer one at a yard sale a few years ago. Maybe he was thinking of that one. ;)
 
A list of romanticized knives from the "great outdoors" past. Which makes sense given the magazine.
 
Utter nonsense from the outset. It makes no sense whatsoever to have styles like "the ulu" and "the leuku" and "the Nessmu" mixed in there with specific models.

Some ulus are garbage. Some aren't. It's like having:

Greatest Basebal Players of All Time
1) Babe Ruth
2) Pitchers
3) Ty Cobb
.
.
.

Silly.
Did you read the article? The author goes on to name specific makers/manufacturers of those models you listed.
 
some of those are classics... very specific high-end knives by Randall, Goddard, Lake, Loveless, etc... others are not so much... Schrade, Victorinox, etc...

so, are we talking specific, amazing knives? or generic styles that 'changed the landscape'? this list is all over...

I would love to have a Busse, I have several Letherman knives... who over 50 doesn't (or didn't) have a Buck 110...

It is like the author just thought about this for a few minutes... and wham... a list...
 
Did you read the article? The author goes on to name specific makers/manufacturers of those models you listed.

Then why not say them in the list? If the Knives of Alaska Ulu is one of their top 20....say it. Is any ulu as good as that one? If not, then saying "The ulu" or "the leuku" is nonsense.
 
Back
Top