Hello everyone,
I was wondering what you think about the shape of the commander blade. I love the way it looks, but I am interested about how practical it actually is in use.
My concerns are mainly for SD purposes.
I don't have a commander yet (I will soon hopefully), but, from the pictures, I see that the blade does not have quite the point as, say, the BM AFCK. Also, the blade is wider overall and actually curves into the point, unlike the blade of the AFCK that is more straight into the point.
I must say I like the shape of the Emerson Commander better than just about any other knife in its league. But do these characteristics of the blade have advantages when it comes to SD? It looks like it would be advantageous when it comes to slashing.
I look forward to hearing what the experts say about this.
Thanks Guys!
I was wondering what you think about the shape of the commander blade. I love the way it looks, but I am interested about how practical it actually is in use.
My concerns are mainly for SD purposes.
I don't have a commander yet (I will soon hopefully), but, from the pictures, I see that the blade does not have quite the point as, say, the BM AFCK. Also, the blade is wider overall and actually curves into the point, unlike the blade of the AFCK that is more straight into the point.
I must say I like the shape of the Emerson Commander better than just about any other knife in its league. But do these characteristics of the blade have advantages when it comes to SD? It looks like it would be advantageous when it comes to slashing.
I look forward to hearing what the experts say about this.
