The do-nothing article

Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
8,250
I was just wondering what you guys thought of this article. It seems to be about spot on for how I camp. All of the "bushcrafty" things that I produce, I produce at home and I've been realizing that I'm doing it more out of a need for a hobby rather than a need for the item that's being produced. I actually find nothing much that you produce in the bushcraft hobby that comes in handy while camping. Yes knowing how to make a spoon is great if you forgot your spork but drinking out of the vessel works too. i.e. I'm not going to starve for the lack of a spoon. Pot hangers are great and a cool thing to know but I've never used one and can't see using one in the near future. 2 rocks/logs close together has always worked for me. Knowing how to make rope is a good skill but I've never needed it. I find you can make a pretty good shelter where I live with no cordage whatsoever and shelter has been the only thing I've ever used cordage for while camping(tarps etc). The only real thing that I've gained from studying bushcraft is the knowledge. Learning how to read sign, tell the time, find wild edibles and predicting the weather conditions through cloud formations pays off in spaids but it's not a product. Maybe I'm just lazy. ;)







The Art of Nothing
by Thomas J. Elpel
Westerners who first met the Shoshonean bands of Indians in the Great Basin Desert typically described them as being "wretched and lazy". Many observers remarked that they lived in a total wasteland and yet seemed to do nothing to improve their situation. They built no houses or villages; they had few tools or possessions, almost no art, and they stored little food. It seemed that all they did was sit around and do nothing.

The Shoshone were true hunter-gatherers. They spent their lives walking from one food source to another. The reason they did not build houses was because houses were useless to them in their nomadic lifestyle. Everything they owned they carried on their backs from place to place. They did not manufacture a lot of tools or possessions or art, because it would have been a burden to carry.

We often expect that such primitive cultures as the Shoshone must have worked all the time just to stay alive, but in actuality these were generally very leisured peoples. Anthropological studies in different parts of the world have indicated that nomadic hunter-gatherer type societies typically worked only two or three hours per day for their subsistence. Like the deer and other creatures of the wild, hunter-gatherer peoples have nothing more to do than to wander and eat.

The Shoshone had a lot of time on their hands only because they produced almost no material culture. They were not being lazy; they were just being economical. Sitting around doing nothing for hours on end helped them to conserve precious calories of energy, so they would not have to harvest so many calories each day to feed themselves.

Today many of us westerners find ourselves fascinated with these simple cultures, and a few of us really dive into it to reproduce or recreate the primitive lifestyle. In our typical western zeal we get right into it and produce, produce, produce. We work ambitiously to learn each primitive craft, and we produce all kinds of primitive clothing, tools, containers, and art, and just plain stuff. True hunter-gatherer cultures carried all their possessions on their backs, but us modern primitives soon find that we need a pickup truck just to move camp! In our effort to recreate the primitive lifestyle we find that we have ironically missed our mark completely-- that we have made many primitive things, but that we have not begun to grasp the true nature of a primitive culture. To truly grasp that essence requires that we let go, and begin to understand the art of doing nothing.

Understanding the art of nothing is a somewhat challenging concept for us westerners. When we go on a "primitive" camping trip, we take our western preconceptions with us. We find a level spot in a meadow to build our shelters, and if a site is not level then we make it so. Then we gather materials and start from scratch, building the walls and roof of a shelter. We do what we are accustomed to; we build a frame house on a surveyed plot in the meadow. Then we gather materials and shingle our shelter, regardless of whether or not there is a cloud in the sky, or whether or not it has rained at all in a month.

Part of the reason we act this way stems from our cultural upbringing. Another part of it is simply because it is easier for those of us who are instructors to teach something rather than to teach nothing. It is much easier to teach how to make something than to teach how not to need to make anything. The do-something approach to primitive skills is to make everything you need, while the do-nothing method is to find everything.

For example, the do-nothing method of shelter is to find shelter, rather than to build it. Two hours spent searching for a partial shelter that can be improved upon can easily save you two hours of hard-working construction time, and you will usually get a better shelter this way. More so, the do-nothing method of shelter is to look first at the incoming weather, and to build only what is needed. If it is not going to rain then you may be able to do-nothing to rain-proof your shelter. Then perhaps you will only need to put your efforts into a shelter that will keep you warm, instead of both warm and dry.

There are many things, both small and large, that a person can do, or not do, to better the art of doing nothing. This can be as simple as cupping one's hands to drink from the stream, instead of making and carrying a cup, to breaking sticks to find a sharpened point, rather than using a knife to methodically carve out a digging stick. Hand carved wooden spoons and forks are do-something utensils that you have to manufacture, carry, and worst, that you have to clean. But chopsticks (twigs) are do-nothing utensils that do not need to be manufactured or carried, and you can toss them in the fire when you are done.

Henry David Thoreau wrote of having a rock for a paperweight at his cabin by Walden pond. He threw it out when he discovered he had to dust it. This is the very essence of a do-nothing attitude.

The do-nothing approach to primitive skills is something that you do. Doing nothing is a way of saving time and energy, so that you can finish your daily work more effectively. One thing that I have found through the years of experimental research into primitive skills, is that there is rarely enough hours in a day to complete all of a day's tasks. It is difficult to go out and build a shelter, make a working bowdrill set, set traps, dig roots, make bowls and spoons, and cook dinner. Hunter-gatherer societies succeeded in working only two to three hours per day, yet in our efforts to reproduce their lifestyle we end up working all day.

Doing nothing is an approach to research; it is a way of thinking and doing. For instance, I do a lot of timed studies of various primitive skills: i.e.: how long does it take to construct a particular shelter? How much of a particular food resource can I harvest per hour? Can I increase the harvest using different gathering techniques? One thing I have noted is that it is only marginally economical to manufacture common primitive deadfall traps. It is time intensive; it adds weight to carry, and the traps often have short life-spans. The do-nothing alternative is to use whatever is at hand, to pick up sticks and assemble them into a trap, without even using a knife. Preliminary tests of this "no-method" have produced results equal to conventional, carved and manufactured traps, but with a much smaller investment of time.

Primitive hunter-gatherer type cultures were very good at doing nothing. Exactly how well they did this is difficult to determine, however, because doing nothing leaves nothing behind for the archaeological record. Every time we find an artifact we have documentation of something they did; yet the most important part of their skills may have been what they did not, and there is no way to discover what that was by studying what they did.

Nevertheless, what you will discover for yourself, as you learn the art of doing nothing is that you are much more at home in the wilderness. No longer will you be so dependent on a lot of tools and gadgets; no longer will you need to shape the elements of nature to fit our western definitions. You will find you need less and less, until one day you find you need nothing at all. Then you will have the time on your hands so that you can choose to do nothing, or even to go do something.

Thomas J. Elpel is the director of Hollowtop Outdoor Primitive School in Pony Montana, and the author of numerous books, including Participating in Nature: Wilderness Survival and Primitive Living Skills. The Art of Nothing was published in the Society of Primitive Technology's Bulletin of Primitive Technology, Issue #10, Fall 1995.
 
Fascinating. I'm intruiged by the fact that many so-called "primitive" cultures were much more leisurely than we are now. I remember reading once that most hunter-gatherers worked about 2-3 hours a day to maintain their survival. A stark contrast with our 8-10 hours a day culture.
 
Everybody should test how easy it is for them not to eat for a few days and they'll be more relaxed about survival scenarios.
Yes you will get slow and sleep more and at some point feel a bit bad but nothing too serious in my opinion.
Didn't have to do it longer than 3 days (army) and always had half a pint of water per day.

2 out of 40 guys passed out while running during that time. So yeah be careful and don't sue me, but your chances are good.
 
it's a hobby - bingo! some people collect and fondle their knives only. i find that i get the most enjoyment when i'm using my knives.

as a side note, i find that some people who are members here will probably be more at home in backpackinglight.com. every trip report i've seen there people are just standing around, doing nothing :p
 
I've always been amazed by how different people's views are when it comes to outdoors hobbies. Hunters, hikers, geocachers, skiers, climbers, mountain bikers, horse riders all have way different needs/wants/gripes/likes. I for one, are like you Shotgun. When I plan a car camping trip, I end up doing bushcrafty things because it provides me with something to do; especially with my boys. But when I am hiking, backpacking or hunting, I want to see the area that I am there to see. I don't want to have to rely on cutting a tree down in a heavy use area in order to build a shelter. That's why they sell tarptents! I believe bushcraft teaches secondary skills that I have really benefited from; like knife sharpening , fire building, and hunting, but I hardly ever use the knowledge of shelter building, cordage, etc. In fact, the lack of me doing these (to me mundane) tasks has really made me realize that I don't need an expensive, long and thick knife to go in the woods. To each his own though. I really enjoy watching a guy like Ray Mears share his love of nature and lore, and I really love how he spins the positives of maintaining those skills in order to maintain the common links between older generations and new ones.
 
I was just wondering what you guys thought of this article.

I like the "let's get real and stop wasting time with unnecessary stuff" gist of it, and that it addresses one of my pet peeves about shelter building.
There was a video of someone building a shelter here several years ago that would have served as a prime example, because they used a deadfall as a source of material for a free-standing "survival shelter" that provided less shelter than the deadfall did. It was time-consuming, labor-intensive, and provided little actual shelter. Exemplifies the inability of many to see what's right in front of them, and blind dedication to a particular way of doing things that is the opposite of a survival mindset.
On the other hand, there is the implication that many "one time" endeavors that are done when establishing a location are daily tasks to overstate bushcrafting and traveling over distance in a short time not going hand in hand. You don't have to exaggerate to make an obvious point, and that's always a turnoff.


as a side note, i find that some people who are members here will probably be more at home in backpackinglight.com. every trip report i've seen there people are just standing around, doing nothing :p
Funny, I was just thinking how awesome it was that there are trip reports from Europe, Greenland, the Sierras, and the AT, all on one page there. Sure beats endless discussions of tv show personalities and Cub Scout skills.
 
Funny, I was just thinking how awesome it was that there are trip reports from Europe, Greenland, the Sierras, and the AT, all on one page there. Sure beats endless discussions of tv show personalities and Cub Scout skills.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
 
Long, long ago ... as a kid I grew up in a time of freedom, safety, trust. Wow - we would follow the firetrucks on bicycles and our parents would be angry at our late arrival for dinner ... but would not misunderstanding our quest.

Camping, travel across Canada camping, to me has always been a basic touchstone to the natural, the independence of knowing how to survive well in any given environment. I am not talking 'eat your dog' survival, but a clear understanding of 'how to set a fire, how to stay dry and warm, how to shelter, manage toilet hygiene' kind of knowledge. Gotta say I have covered the territory as a child and as an adult and that I manage with the help of such knowledge.

Bladeforums is a tested source of knowledge and support for the outdoor goers of every level. Yup. To me self-proclaimed Gear Whores are educators. I have all I need for sure, but I always want to know what is current and workable, affordable, innovative.

Gosh, I am lazier with every passing day. But I keep an eye on 'what's new' and truly respect this forum for the diversity of information and opinion
 
I like the "keep it simple" approach. There is no need to unduly complicate things and do something just for the sake of doing something.
 
Funny, I was just thinking how awesome it was that there are trip reports from Europe, Greenland, the Sierras, and the AT, all on one page there. Sure beats endless discussions of tv show personalities and Cub Scout skills.

but that's what's good about this sub-forum - it gives beginners looking for those "cub scout skills" a place to see it/learn it. i don't want to go to a hunting forum and all i see is a bunch of store-bought food being cooked on a stove, i expect to see/learn about rifle & spotting scope setups/meat taken from the field being processed, etc.

if i want to see a bunch of cast iron cookware and axes being used to carve spoons, bcusa is filled with those kinds of threads...what i'm saying is people should find the type of forum that fits their style and keep that going with their threads rather than try and fit the forum to their style of enjoying the woods. that's why we have all these different forums to begin with.
 
Last edited:
I'm a big proponent of doing nothing. In the woods or the living room, I can not move for hours on end.

The key, though, is that I do know how to do all the wilderness survival stuff. I can whittle spoons, forge knives, tan hides, etc. But I only do that for entertainment purposes because my survival needs have long since been met. Why make a fancy cooking set up when my pot can rest on the coals?

Of course, if you don't have all that foofaraw out there, folks won't think you're nearly as capable as the guy down the street. Like having a degree from a college to get a job, you need to make your abilities known to others before they will begin to give you any credit.

So, do like I do and practice being a hermit seeking the approval of none, content in the knowledge attained over the years and finding no need to prove it.
 
Of course, if you don't have all that foofaraw out there, folks won't think you're nearly as capable as the guy down the street. Like having a degree from a college to get a job, you need to make your abilities known to others before they will begin to give you any credit.
I wondered where you were going with that. I don't care what people think. Then I saw the next part.

So, do like I do and practice being a hermit seeking the approval of none, content in the knowledge attained over the years and finding no need to prove it.
Exactly.
 
Great post, Shotgun. Similar thing I've come to think (not explicitly stated like in the opening post) while I was watching the life of a pair of Peregrine falcon nesting near my house. They have much more leisure time than typical Japanese businessmen. Although they have extreme speed and superb eyesight which we never own, I thought we could do better. Thinking about essentials is great and bushcraft is one of the way to do so, at least for me.
 
The more lazy and hypocritical we get, the more we screw up the simple things.
I loved learning about the way Australian Aborigine's lived and still do. I don't like the way we've screwed them up along with a lot of other aborigine's in other countries.
The more we advance the more we lose about the basics of living with the land ... as I type into my computer.
The irony is that I've learned so much from the internet about living off the land.
We are intelligent enough to build what we want even when someone else has the best living location. We farm to provide a variety and quantity of foods. We need to live near our farms and places of work. There are soo many angles that come into this thread ...
Our land is our life.
 
The problem is that farming - the way it is done today - is destroying the land, making it sterile. And there isn't much variety of crops. When you go to the store it's the same fruits and veggies over and over. Count how many different ones there are - it isn't many.
There is more variety in wild edible plants which grow without farming. With careful planting they could be helped to propagate in larger quantities without modern farming methods. Many wild plants can produce more food per acre than cultivated plants.
Learning to live off the land means learning to work with the land, not fighting it trying to do things our way.
 
The problem is that farming - the way it is done today - is destroying the land, making it sterile. And there isn't much variety of crops. When you go to the store it's the same fruits and veggies over and over. Count how many different ones there are - it isn't many.
There is more variety in wild edible plants which grow without farming. With careful planting they could be helped to propagate in larger quantities without modern farming methods. Many wild plants can produce more food per acre than cultivated plants.
Learning to live off the land means learning to work with the land, not fighting it trying to do things our way.
Less acres, more people to feed. What would you do? 1000 acres of blueberries or 1000 acres of corn. I live in Illinois. 200 years ago there weren't oranges here. Too cold to grow them. The variety of fruits and vegetables we have in the grocery store now is higher than it has ever been, thanks to modern food processing and packaging and freezing practices.

If you've eaten today, thank a farmer with his modern practices. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Does it hurt the soil? Maybe, but unless every single man, woman, and child is willing to go back to the days of farming their own acre and living in only what they could produce from out and their livestock, it will never change. All 8 million people in NYC farming to live. Same in Chicago, LA,.Mephis, Dallas, Miami. Etc, etc. Not going to happen.
 
Modern agricultural crops are evolved from far less productive wild grasses, grains, berries, roots and fruits. More food to feed more people with fewer acres. I am not aware of any farmer using modern methods and crops who renders their soil sterile. The fact is that food (plant and animal) is at an all time high in production while the number of people engaged in agriculture is at near an all time low. Likewise the variety of foods available year round has never been better. I well remember when a special Christmas treat, in mid-winter, was an apple, an orange and a tangerine. They were exotics at that time of year. Now grocers in even small towns stock pineapples, apples, bananas, citrus and other fruits and vegetables year round, much of it from South America and around the globe if not California or Florida.

While I am not a fan of industrial agriculture for many reasons, there is no escaping the fact that there is no going back to small family farms, rural living and trying to subsist on locally grown foods and wild gleanings. For one thing in this country alone, our population has more than doubled since 1950. And much of that population lives in urban areas where growing food is not possible. IF they even had the time, ability and inclination which they don't.
 
Back
Top