The Mystique of the Peanut?

Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
314
The peanut pattern has an almost cult following on this forum, and I'm wondering why?

Now don't get me wrong, I am already a convert!
I received a RR peanut in a trade. I didn't attach much significance to it at the time, but I've found that it hasn't left my pocket since I got it. I even forgot it was there for a couple of days, and was surprised to discover it rattling around with my small change.
I've used this little knife a lot, and I can genuinely appreciate the merit of having a small knife that's there when you need it.

However, I have noticed that there are a lot of small knives available from various manufacturers.

What is it about the peanut that sets it apart from the likes of the tiny trappers, mini stockmans etc?

The reason I ask is that now I have a new appreciation of small knives, I'm thinking of buying a really nice one as a constant companion, and I want to buy the right one first time.
 
I'd like to tell ya James, but I can't. I wish I could explain it, but the problem is that I'm not really sure myself. Its the kind of thing you have to experience, then you'll get it or not. Some people may not ever get it, but most will once they try it.

It's like the old VW bug. In the 1960's the ugly little car with the engine at the wrong end, took the U.S. and other countries by storm. By 1967, the bug was one of the most popular selling cars in America. People either loved them or hated them. I loved mine so much I kept it for 30 years. Now, decades after they stopped making them, you still see them going down the road. A fully restored body off restored bug will sell for 20,000 and up.

I think the peanut is a lot like that. It IS a mystique, and that's the thing about mystiques, they are not easily explained. Kind of like VW bugs and UFO's. But I'll try.

When my old man passed on, his peanut was sitting on top of my dresser for a very long time. It was my keepsake of him. Way better than a photo. I'd pick up the peanut and I could see him sitting on a log slicing up a snack, or fishing by the river bank, or a zillion other things. To me, the little peanut was kind of like having some part of dad still around.

Then one day, long after he'd gone, I had an impulse to carry it. I don't know why. I was going off to work, and I dropped the knife into my pocket next to my old Buck 301 stockman. That stockman had been with me over 20 years at that point, and was my go-to knife. I only a couple of knives, I had not yet been bit by the affliction.

Well, that morning, I had to cut off some thin rubber sheeting that was padding the vise jaws on my Bridgeport mill, and I stuck my hand in my pocket and it fell on the peanut. To this day I don't know why, but I took out the little Case instead of my Buck, and sliced right down through the stuff. It was like "Huh, cut right through like butter!" The next day I used the it again, and had another "Huh, little bugger is sharp, cut right though the stuff." Over the next week, I had several of those "Huh!" moments that I did the unthinkable. I bought a yellow handle CV peanut because it was the cheapest one to experiment with, and in spite of some very great hesitation, left my old war horse stockman home.

It was a weird week. At first I missed my stockman. I felt under knifed. I missed the comforting weight of the Buck. But then I got a flicker of the light bulb. The weight of the Buck? The little peanut had done everything I had asked of it, but I missed having this weight in my pocket? I gave it another week, and the light from the bulb got a little brighter. My pocket felt empty, yet when I needed a knife, I reached in and found the peanut under the wadded up bandana ready for use. It was like carrying a very sharp knife without carrying a very sharp knife. It was a neat combination of it disappearing in a pocket until needed, yet when needed it did the job great.

There are other small knives out there, but many, don't have the weird dimension bending of the peanut. Look at a peanut and a SBJ side by side. The SBJ is a much larger knife right? But the tiny peanut has a cutting edge just about the same length as the much bulkier sway back. Same for the barlow. I don't know who the genus at Case who designed the peanut, but he came up with a knife that has the absolute minimum outside closed dimension, but with a main blade longer than most of the similar sized knives. It has cutting ability that is greater than one would think by looking at it closed. But it can only be truly understood by carrying and using it for a length of time. Long enough to adjust to the weirdness of the tool.

Yes there are tiny toothpicks, mini trappers and such but they are relatively late comers to the party. The peanut goes back to the early 1900's, and dawn of our so called modern age. Henry Ford was just putting the world on wheels, Thomas Edison had made music available anywhere with his record machine, and Mr. Bell had just invented the telephone to string us all together. Penmanship was going to hell because now we had the typewriter for business letters. And Wilbur and Orville Wright had just proved man could indeed fly. The modern age was upon us, and lifestyles were changing faster than we could comprehend. People were becoming more affluent and dressed better. Cities were getting bigger, and there was now the dawn of jobs that may not have been white collar, but were a step up from laborer. The skilled worker.

I can only speculate if that somebody at Case came out with the peanut as a knife more suited for the new 'modern age' than the big jackknives, but capable of more real work than a dinky frail built tiny pen knife? But I recall reading that the peanut came out about the time in America where change was happening fast. So who knows?

All I really know is that I love the peanut.

Of course, the mini copperhead is nice too.

Carl.
 
you know, i've said it before and i'll say it again.

I love the blade size of the peanut, its the small handle size that has me wondering. I am a big guy with big hands and i just wonder how well i could hold on to the thing.
because of all these threads and responses by Jackknife, i am saving up for a medium texas jack which looks to be about the same as a peanut with a bigger handle...
 
The Peanut has a good handle shape, combined with the thickness of a two blade knife. Those two factors make it handle much better than you'd expect for such a small knife. I've used mine for some hard cutting tasks and it never felt lacking in grip.
 
Jackknife, I know what you mean about feeling likefeeling like you have a part of your late father in his knife.
I have my grandad's SAK, complete with battered box, although I wouldn't dare carry it for fear of losing it.
I'm not sure you're right about Case inventing the peanut:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...igin-of-the-Peanut-pattern-when-where-who-etc..
Seems the pattern has been around for a while.

I guess the mystique must come from a combination of lots of little things.
The fact that there is a liner in between the blades adds strength, the handle design allows you to place your thumb on the back for extra force and control, and probably many other things.

I wonder if, say a mini trapper would work the same as a peanut, or if it won't quite have the subtle mix of factors that make the peanut 'just right'?
 
you know, i've said it before and i'll say it again.

I love the blade size of the peanut, its the small handle size that has me wondering. I am a big guy with big hands and i just wonder how well i could hold on to the thing.
because of all these threads and responses by Jackknife, i am saving up for a medium texas jack which looks to be about the same as a peanut with a bigger handle...

I think that is probably a good decision. I have half a dozen peanuts from several makers, and I just can't stand to use them for more than a few seconds at a time. They just don't have enogh handle for me to hold onto.
 
But if you have a bigger handle, why not have a bigger blade too?
I think one of the 'mystique factors' of the peanut is the blade length to handle length ratio.
The reason I asked this question in the first place is because, although I have really been enjoying using my peanut, I'm not particularly keen on the way the handle looks. It feels great, but I prefer less curvy looks.
Of course, the shape of the handle is probably one of the things that makes it a good user, so if I got a similar knife with a different shaped handle, I might not like using it as much as I like using the peanut.
Maybe I should just buy one each of the small rough riders to try them out...
 
I tend to like things that are small and have curves. Corvettes, Ferraris, and women. It was only natural to be attracted to the peanut.
 
Jackknife, I know what you mean about feeling likefeeling like you have a part of your late father in his knife.
I have my grandad's SAK, complete with battered box, although I wouldn't dare carry it for fear of losing it.
I'm not sure you're right about Case inventing the peanut:
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/s...igin-of-the-Peanut-pattern-when-where-who-etc..
Seems the pattern has been around for a while.

I guess the mystique must come from a combination of lots of little things.
The fact that there is a liner in between the blades adds strength, the handle design allows you to place your thumb on the back for extra force and control, and probably many other things.

I wonder if, say a mini trapper would work the same as a peanut, or if it won't quite have the subtle mix of factors that make the peanut 'just right'?

The mini trapper is one of my absolute favorites, but it isn't a peanut. I bought a peanut about 6 years ago on a whim, and kinda laughed at it when it arrived. But after having it in pocket, it really started to grow on me. I did have to keep checking though to make sure it was still there.

I think I am just to fond of the mini trapper though, to continue using a peanut on a daily basis. I'm sure some of it is mental, but having big hands, I like the feel of a knife that is just a little bigger though
 
The old peanut was my first start of collecting, mostly Case for years, then quit when they started with all the odd looking scale patterns to me (MHO) Then started with collecting custom peanuts, you would not believe how hard it is to find those. My first was a score of one by the Master Tony Bose. Finally after not finding many available, started placing orders with makers. So far, I have had 5 makers to commit and then back out on the pattern. It is a hard pattern to make. Tony told me personally at Blade 2008 that I had better hang onto his because he would never make another. The peanut has a calling all of its own and it knows who loves them. :)
 
I'm personally not a peanut enthusiast but I came across this and thought some of you may want an economical peanut alternative...
18330.jpg

...it's made by Case and called the "Camo Caliber Zytel Peanut"
 
I'm personally not a peanut enthusiast but I came across this and thought some of you may want an economical peanut alternative...
18330.jpg

...it's made by Case and called the "Camo Caliber Zytel Peanut"

That would make an outstanding UL backpacking knife. Scissors and a small blade.
 
A small knife with sturdy blades and springs. Handle is big enough to hold on to, but blades are short enough for very precise work. Makes sense to me.
 
Back
Top