- Joined
- Jun 16, 2013
- Messages
- 26
Not sure if this is the right place for this. Mods, feel free to move if needed.
Speaking specifically about edged tools, I must admit, the "one knife to do it all" mindset was very attractive to me not so long ago. Carry less weight and still get the job done! Who wouldn't want that?
However, as I put this into practice more and more, I had to ask myself, why? Why would I want to spend 5-10 minutes chopping through a log with my knife when my Bahco saw could get through it in under 2? Why would I baton firewood with my knife when they make splitting axes for precisely such activities? Why try to effectively carve detail work with a 6" long 1/4" thick slab of steel when a Mora or small folder can do the job much better? Was the trek into my destination much easier without the weight of extra tools? Easier yes, but by much? Not really.
It occurred to me that the energy saved through hiking with less weight, only about 5 pounds mind you, was spent later while setting up camp and doing other tasks that were made more strenuous by not having the right tool for the job. Not to mention, if you go in with just one big knife and that knife breaks or gets lost, your one tool option turns into no tool, no option!
Don't get me wrong, if I were in a true survival scenario and only had one knife, I defiantly would like it to be able to do all these tasks at least moderately well. But let's be honest with ourselves, for most of us out there in the sticks, a true long term survival scenario is rarely going to occur. If anything, most of the time we would be looking at a three day inconvenient camping trip at worst (MOST of the time). And in that case a knife isn't even necessarily a requriment. If you can't last three days in the woods without a knife you might not belong there in the first place. But this thread isn't about survival, it's about what you carry into the wood for your trip and why, so let me get back on track.
Is one big knife to do it all fun? Sure, maybe, but why not carry the right tool for the right job? And then if you want to use just the knife, do so. At least you would have the right tool if you needed it. What do you guys think about the "one tool option" mindset? Do you subscribe to it or do you use many tools on a trip?
Personally, I take a good belt knife and two folders, a folding or bow saw, an axe or hatchet of sorts (lately a tomahawk), and a multi-tool, and use what I need when I need it. It seems to be much easier for me than doing everything with one knife, also there is significantly less dulling to the edge of my tools.
Just my humble opinion, there's nothing wrong with doing it another way. I'm interested in what you all choose to take on your trips!
Thanks for reading! And thanks in advance for any replies, your opinions are valued and appreciated!
NOTE: I am referring to multiple day trips, ie, three or more days. On a day trip or maybe just an overnight I take fewer tools. Maybe just my saw, belt knife and multi-tool. Just wanted to clarify the length of trip I'm talking about.
Speaking specifically about edged tools, I must admit, the "one knife to do it all" mindset was very attractive to me not so long ago. Carry less weight and still get the job done! Who wouldn't want that?
However, as I put this into practice more and more, I had to ask myself, why? Why would I want to spend 5-10 minutes chopping through a log with my knife when my Bahco saw could get through it in under 2? Why would I baton firewood with my knife when they make splitting axes for precisely such activities? Why try to effectively carve detail work with a 6" long 1/4" thick slab of steel when a Mora or small folder can do the job much better? Was the trek into my destination much easier without the weight of extra tools? Easier yes, but by much? Not really.
It occurred to me that the energy saved through hiking with less weight, only about 5 pounds mind you, was spent later while setting up camp and doing other tasks that were made more strenuous by not having the right tool for the job. Not to mention, if you go in with just one big knife and that knife breaks or gets lost, your one tool option turns into no tool, no option!
Don't get me wrong, if I were in a true survival scenario and only had one knife, I defiantly would like it to be able to do all these tasks at least moderately well. But let's be honest with ourselves, for most of us out there in the sticks, a true long term survival scenario is rarely going to occur. If anything, most of the time we would be looking at a three day inconvenient camping trip at worst (MOST of the time). And in that case a knife isn't even necessarily a requriment. If you can't last three days in the woods without a knife you might not belong there in the first place. But this thread isn't about survival, it's about what you carry into the wood for your trip and why, so let me get back on track.
Is one big knife to do it all fun? Sure, maybe, but why not carry the right tool for the right job? And then if you want to use just the knife, do so. At least you would have the right tool if you needed it. What do you guys think about the "one tool option" mindset? Do you subscribe to it or do you use many tools on a trip?
Personally, I take a good belt knife and two folders, a folding or bow saw, an axe or hatchet of sorts (lately a tomahawk), and a multi-tool, and use what I need when I need it. It seems to be much easier for me than doing everything with one knife, also there is significantly less dulling to the edge of my tools.
Just my humble opinion, there's nothing wrong with doing it another way. I'm interested in what you all choose to take on your trips!
Thanks for reading! And thanks in advance for any replies, your opinions are valued and appreciated!
NOTE: I am referring to multiple day trips, ie, three or more days. On a day trip or maybe just an overnight I take fewer tools. Maybe just my saw, belt knife and multi-tool. Just wanted to clarify the length of trip I'm talking about.


