I've read a lot of comments saying that the knife is strong only as much as it's weakest link. Usually this comment associated with a folding knife and the weakest point being the fact that the knife is folding. Like one of the recent comments saying that folding knife is already "broken" in half by design and can't be made stronger by using a thicker blade.
I strongly disagree with this point of view. In my experience, the weakest link is the user.
In the order of being the weakest I would put those:
1) The user. One has to be really weak in the head to perform most of the tasks that destroy knives.
2) I will put the lock strength here, though I used to play with slipjoints when I was a kid and I have broken the tips, I have broken the blade in half, I have destroyed the edge. The fact that knife didn't have any lock at all, didn't stop me from using it.
3) There are enough tasks that require prying. If the first link is already broken or it is such an emergency that one has no other way of doing it other than prying with the knife, then blade tip will give up next.
4) Another common thing is edge being completely ruined by improper use. Yet again, the mind has already been compromised.
5) Blade thickness. Again some serious prying. The blade will break in half before knife will break in the pivot area.
I have yet to come across a quality folding knife that will brake in the pivot area before snapping the blade. I think that strength of the pivot in the modern knife is a bit overrated.
When compared to a fixed blade, for most tasks, I think blade geometry (tip strength, thickness) will play much bigger role than the fact that the knife is folding.
Probably many people here seen the video of a guy using Zero Tolerance knives to cut through bolts and pretty much destroying them.
1) Mind gives up first
2) Edge was ruined
3) Blade was broken in half on ZT0200
4) Lock on ZT0300 gave up when knife was hammered into 2x4
5) Tip was broken on ZT0300
What do you think?
I strongly disagree with this point of view. In my experience, the weakest link is the user.
In the order of being the weakest I would put those:
1) The user. One has to be really weak in the head to perform most of the tasks that destroy knives.
2) I will put the lock strength here, though I used to play with slipjoints when I was a kid and I have broken the tips, I have broken the blade in half, I have destroyed the edge. The fact that knife didn't have any lock at all, didn't stop me from using it.
3) There are enough tasks that require prying. If the first link is already broken or it is such an emergency that one has no other way of doing it other than prying with the knife, then blade tip will give up next.
4) Another common thing is edge being completely ruined by improper use. Yet again, the mind has already been compromised.
5) Blade thickness. Again some serious prying. The blade will break in half before knife will break in the pivot area.
I have yet to come across a quality folding knife that will brake in the pivot area before snapping the blade. I think that strength of the pivot in the modern knife is a bit overrated.
When compared to a fixed blade, for most tasks, I think blade geometry (tip strength, thickness) will play much bigger role than the fact that the knife is folding.
Probably many people here seen the video of a guy using Zero Tolerance knives to cut through bolts and pretty much destroying them.
1) Mind gives up first
2) Edge was ruined
3) Blade was broken in half on ZT0200
4) Lock on ZT0300 gave up when knife was hammered into 2x4
5) Tip was broken on ZT0300
What do you think?
Last edited: