I for one would stay away from the GB or the AR heck the SnG might have interesting discoveries once in field.
Heres why a Buck Strider 880 is better, no 3m holding the folder washers together.
I had a valid question/point about the use of 3M adgesive in
the
knife, and nobody at SK or on the forum seemed willing to really respond to it, unless
calling
you names is a response.
Strider folders are supposed to be the
the strongest, toughest, most IMPERVIOUS folder available,
but
any object <B>is only as strong as its weakest link, and i have to admit,
the
idea that there is an adhesive in the knife, an adhesive that the knife
relies on, bothers me and should bother others.</B> Adhesives, by their very nature, are not
permanent,
but relatively fragile, and are <B>vulnerable to extremes of
heat/cold/moisture
or chemicals, </B>which will cause at least some deterioration, and to have
a knife that's claim to fame is how tough it is, have this
vulnerability,
seems to me like a poor design chrarcteristic, even if the Strider
fanatics
refuse to entertain the question. If i found out tomorrow that my Chris
Reeve knives or my Buck/Strider relied on an adhesive in their design, I would probably sell
them.
Mick Strider said he uses the adhesive to cushion the blade, well
surely
a thin nylon, urethane, or similar soft, but durable washer or bushing
could
be used for that, one that will not deteriorate when exposed to chemicals
or
harsh elements.
So, in any case, I would seriously rethinking my purchase, because the
idea of a knife, billed as the toughest available, that relies on an
inherently
fragile adhesive, bothers me, and i thank you for bringing it to my
attention.
Why pay $400 for a knife that is supposed to be impervious to
EVERYTHING,
if it has a componenet in its design that clearly is NOT impervious to
several
things. Sort of defeats the whole purpose to me of the knife.
<B>Check the forum for further evidence and matters pertaining to the picky AR's and rebuild frequency.</B>