- Joined
- Jun 19, 2023
- Messages
- 70
I thought I had decided on a TSprof k03 and then found this forum and learned about the Kazak Pro. Spent some time reading on them and then read up on the Hampstone R2 and RS. I can officially say that I am almost back to square one now because of everything that I have read. The TSprof seems to get some of the highest reviews for build quality but accessories cost more. The Kazak Pro has good reviews and from what I’ve read on here is a quality unit with good accessories if needed. The Hampstone R2 and RS both have good reviews and are economically priced with multiple accessories available. It seems that all three of these sharpeners can be used to produce good results. I know that personal preference plays into a lot of what we buy and use on a daily basis which is why I was originally looking at the k03 as it appears to be almost over built. But now I am wondering is that really needed and is the extra cost justified for the quality of the sharpening that it can do when compared to the Kazak or Hampstone. I also saw where 777 Edge is going to have a system coming out soon so that may throw another wrench in my thought process. With all that being said, does the higher priced k03 when used properly produce a better more consistent edge than the Kazak or Hampstone? Can the Hampstone R2 or RS produce the same quality of edge/sharpness consistently when used properly as the k03 or Kazak? I also can’t forget that I just read about the Toohr #3 and that brings up the same issues. I do know that I like these styles of sharpeners and will be ordering one of them shortly and understand that like anything the longer you use something the more proficient you generally become. I do not expect to produce perfect edges right from the start especially since I still trying to figure out the multiple stone configurations and what they all are deigned to do. I appreciate any responses as I am new to this and am really trying to learn as much as I can. Cheers!