I've been drawn to these for quite some time but have some concerns. First, you have no way to know if it is working or not. (I mean effectively purifying the water, not just lighting up.) Ancedotic evidence, that is, "I used it and didn't get sick." doesn't really prove that the water was purified. It may have been safe or the drinker may have been lucky.
Since you can't tell from looking whether it is accomplishing the task it is designed for, your next choice is to verify. This means to take a water sample from a suspect source and divide it in to two portions. Treat one with a SteriPEN and keep one as a control. Send both for analysis. Obviously this is a pretty inconvenient way for a user to test a piece of field gear, so hopefully you'll be able to rely on similar testing by others.
The
US Army did such testing and the SteriPEN failed. There was some question about whether the water was too cloudy to be a valid test, so they pulled the test data from their website.
Ron Hood had purchased a SteriPEN and was quite taken with it until he treated some water and had it tested. It failed, so he is back to using Iodine and filtration.
I REALLY want this device to work. SteriPEN has some commissioned tests on their website, although they were kind of buried. I haven't had the time to wade through these yet. I'm a gear junkie and think it would be quite useful. Nonetheless, I'll wait until there is reliable data as to its effectiveness in purifying water.
-- FLIX