- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
- Messages
- 9,786
I went into work this morning and got there a bit earlier than usual. One of my co-workers was there and we started chatting. It soon lapsed into our usual bitch-session about our teenage kids (something we both have in common). Not a bad bitching, just the kind of good natured roll your eyes at the stereotype behaviors that we in fact witness.
The one thing we were both bemoaning is the difficulty of instilling an appreciation for energy conservation. You know the usual little things like turning off lights, leaving the (my gosh) computer on constantly so it can file-sharing-network your prescribed bandwidth all to hell, leaving the hair dryer on.
Just the other day, my son was telling me about those e-cars that are built in Canada - the ones they won't let on the roads because they are too slow. Anyhow, he tells me that this car would be great for him because it would be free to drive. FREE! I called him on it and explained to him, no, its not free. You would be plugging that thing into my outlet and I would be paying the power bill. I'm sure this thing would be cheaper to drive than gas, but the point I'm trying to make is to my son (who is 17 btw) he did not view electrical power (or my paying the monthly bill) as a family expense. It simply was not real to him. For him, any appliance that plugs into the wall is 'free' to operate. Whereas portable things that have batteries have consumable expenses.
So getting to the point of this thread. My colleague and I were brainstorming how to drive home the electrical usage point. Make them think about not only how much power different items use, but also to consider a mind set of - 'what if there was only so much power you had access to in a day'. We thought we came up with a pretty good demonstration exercise. You would have to be a real ballbreaker of a parent to actually implement this, but I think it would work. I even thought - this might be a good thing to try on my own sometime - like when the kids are off and using the FREE power at their grandparents or something.
So the challenge. First you have to get rid of the outlets - or at least de-wire them leaving only a single centralized (guarded) outlet that remains hot. Second I would also dismantle the light fixtures. Each person in the family gets their own battery backup. These are the portable car-battery thingies with the AC converters on them. Each person is allowed to charge up their car-battery at night so they start the day with a fully charged one. They get to drag this thing around wherever they want. They make make their personal choices about how to use that power. Want light - then plug in a lamp. Want internet - well that requires plugging in the computer. You can tweak a bit more time if you turn off the lamp while doing so. Want to blow dry your hair? Well you better think about that one pretty carefully....
Okay - the first couple of days would probably be hell. You'd probably be running out of power right off the bat as you made the wrong decisions about power requirements. Obviously I'd still allow major appliances like refrigerator, water heater, and oven, but I'd still get rid of the toaster ect.
So does my little thought experiment have merit? Would it be useful to do for survival purposes - i.e. feedback on what you need and what you could get away with with limited power (generator ect.)? Is a single battery way too little power (even keeping the major appliances) to sustain a somewhat normal lifestyle? Am I just a cheap bastard of a parent?
The one thing we were both bemoaning is the difficulty of instilling an appreciation for energy conservation. You know the usual little things like turning off lights, leaving the (my gosh) computer on constantly so it can file-sharing-network your prescribed bandwidth all to hell, leaving the hair dryer on.
Just the other day, my son was telling me about those e-cars that are built in Canada - the ones they won't let on the roads because they are too slow. Anyhow, he tells me that this car would be great for him because it would be free to drive. FREE! I called him on it and explained to him, no, its not free. You would be plugging that thing into my outlet and I would be paying the power bill. I'm sure this thing would be cheaper to drive than gas, but the point I'm trying to make is to my son (who is 17 btw) he did not view electrical power (or my paying the monthly bill) as a family expense. It simply was not real to him. For him, any appliance that plugs into the wall is 'free' to operate. Whereas portable things that have batteries have consumable expenses.
So getting to the point of this thread. My colleague and I were brainstorming how to drive home the electrical usage point. Make them think about not only how much power different items use, but also to consider a mind set of - 'what if there was only so much power you had access to in a day'. We thought we came up with a pretty good demonstration exercise. You would have to be a real ballbreaker of a parent to actually implement this, but I think it would work. I even thought - this might be a good thing to try on my own sometime - like when the kids are off and using the FREE power at their grandparents or something.
So the challenge. First you have to get rid of the outlets - or at least de-wire them leaving only a single centralized (guarded) outlet that remains hot. Second I would also dismantle the light fixtures. Each person in the family gets their own battery backup. These are the portable car-battery thingies with the AC converters on them. Each person is allowed to charge up their car-battery at night so they start the day with a fully charged one. They get to drag this thing around wherever they want. They make make their personal choices about how to use that power. Want light - then plug in a lamp. Want internet - well that requires plugging in the computer. You can tweak a bit more time if you turn off the lamp while doing so. Want to blow dry your hair? Well you better think about that one pretty carefully....
Okay - the first couple of days would probably be hell. You'd probably be running out of power right off the bat as you made the wrong decisions about power requirements. Obviously I'd still allow major appliances like refrigerator, water heater, and oven, but I'd still get rid of the toaster ect.
So does my little thought experiment have merit? Would it be useful to do for survival purposes - i.e. feedback on what you need and what you could get away with with limited power (generator ect.)? Is a single battery way too little power (even keeping the major appliances) to sustain a somewhat normal lifestyle? Am I just a cheap bastard of a parent?