• The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
    Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
    Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.

  • Today marks the 24th anniversary of 9/11. I pray that this nation does not forget the loss of lives from this horrible event. Yesterday conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was murdered, and I worry about what is to come. Please love one another and your family in these trying times - Spark

Thoughts on Sleipner over Niolox??

Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
511
I remember a thread where you Gianni expressed, that you would prefer Sleipner over Niolox.

Any thoughts as to why that might be?

I have an M3, and to me Niolox performs great!

Are the reasons related to practicality in production or related to performance?
 
Both have proved excellent steels. Niolox, good ability to hold the edge, more resistant to corrosion. Sleipner, excellent ability to hold the edge by secondary hardening. Both generate, if properly hardened, fine grain. They have a good resilience. The Sleipner, in both trials that the use by the holders did not give corrosion problems. Therefore, given the choice, the Sleipner is more "complete".
 
Thanks for the insight!

As mentioned, the M3 in Niolox performs perfectly for me, so I'm good.

But I do see en M7 in Sleipner steel in my future...
 
Both have proved excellent steels. Niolox, good ability to hold the edge, more resistant to corrosion. Sleipner, excellent ability to hold the edge by secondary hardening. Both generate, if properly hardened, fine grain. They have a good resilience. The Sleipner, in both trials that the use by the holders did not give corrosion problems. Therefore, given the choice, the Sleipner is more "complete".

Molletta - have you tried Sleipner without secondary hardening, only low tempering (less than 250°)?
Is it inferior in terms of toughness and edge holding?
 
In tempering some steel have a secondary precipitation of carbides.
Secondary carbides which precipitate few during quenching and more during the first tempering are responsible attitude to cutting of those steels.
The primary carbides formed during solidification of the steel. In hardening these partly dissolve.

Sorry for my bad english. :)
 
Back
Top