- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 32
Hey everyone,
I happened to find myself at an auction today and on a table of knives, lo and behold, there was a very familiar but rough looking shape of a khukuri. I pulled it out of the sheath, looked it over a bit, and decided that if the price was right that I would pick it up and add it to the collection. Well, I walked away with it after paying $10. Now I am trying to decide how good of a decision I made. I have a few pictures below, and as many specific numbers that I could get.
So I ask you, the forum: Do you think it's authentic, or not? I have my opinion, but would like the group to weigh in before I give away my less than expert thoughts.
Both sides of the sheath, with the khukuri in it. As you can see it has seen a few miles...
And now what everyone really cares about...
If the pics don't load, here are the numbers:
OAL: 16 3/8"
BL: 12"
Width at Ricasso: 1 1/8"
Width at Belly: 2 1/16"
Drop: 3 3/16"
Weight: ~1 lb (16 oz) (I don't have a scale handy, so this is a guestimate)
Balance Point: Middle of knife, 1/2" behind the shoulder
The blade is fairly sharp, given it's condition
Spine width:
Upper spine (Ricasso): 5/16"
At shoulder: 1/4"
At Belly: 7/32"
1/2" from tip: 1/8"
The karda and chakmak came with it too. The karda is rusty, but very sharp.
Here are close-ups around the bolster/cho, as well as near the pommel. There are no identifying marks or stamps on the blade to indicate a manufacture date/place. If you look, you can see there are two different types of horn used for the handle. The handle is very dry, cracked, and the two different horn pieces shrank differently highlighting the fact there are two.
Here are two pics with it compared to my BAS. My BAS is a 16" OAL, and 20 oz. The BAS feels slightly heavier than the new-old khuk. The spine is also thicker on the BAS.
The handle fits fairly well in my hand, even for having shrunk, and it feels very light and balanced. There is slight concavity on both sides of the blade (~1/32")
So, let me know what you think.
I happened to find myself at an auction today and on a table of knives, lo and behold, there was a very familiar but rough looking shape of a khukuri. I pulled it out of the sheath, looked it over a bit, and decided that if the price was right that I would pick it up and add it to the collection. Well, I walked away with it after paying $10. Now I am trying to decide how good of a decision I made. I have a few pictures below, and as many specific numbers that I could get.
So I ask you, the forum: Do you think it's authentic, or not? I have my opinion, but would like the group to weigh in before I give away my less than expert thoughts.
Both sides of the sheath, with the khukuri in it. As you can see it has seen a few miles...


And now what everyone really cares about...


If the pics don't load, here are the numbers:
OAL: 16 3/8"
BL: 12"
Width at Ricasso: 1 1/8"
Width at Belly: 2 1/16"
Drop: 3 3/16"
Weight: ~1 lb (16 oz) (I don't have a scale handy, so this is a guestimate)
Balance Point: Middle of knife, 1/2" behind the shoulder
The blade is fairly sharp, given it's condition
Spine width:
Upper spine (Ricasso): 5/16"
At shoulder: 1/4"
At Belly: 7/32"
1/2" from tip: 1/8"
The karda and chakmak came with it too. The karda is rusty, but very sharp.

Here are close-ups around the bolster/cho, as well as near the pommel. There are no identifying marks or stamps on the blade to indicate a manufacture date/place. If you look, you can see there are two different types of horn used for the handle. The handle is very dry, cracked, and the two different horn pieces shrank differently highlighting the fact there are two.



Here are two pics with it compared to my BAS. My BAS is a 16" OAL, and 20 oz. The BAS feels slightly heavier than the new-old khuk. The spine is also thicker on the BAS.


The handle fits fairly well in my hand, even for having shrunk, and it feels very light and balanced. There is slight concavity on both sides of the blade (~1/32")
So, let me know what you think.
Last edited: