- Joined
- Feb 24, 2001
- Messages
- 1,308
All I've ever heard about titanium knives is that they are not as hard as stainless steel, for the most part. Now there is a current article (online and in the papers) that says the Concorde crash occurred because the tire was punctured by a piece of debris from a DC-10 that was soooo hard, essentially because it was titanium!
Here's a linked article:
Runway debris a factor in Concorde crash
I want to know what knife-people and metallurgists make out of these claims, which seem to come from the "experts" hired by people suing over the crash. Are they employing mysticism and myth about titanium in order to make illegitimate claims? Would a piece of stainless steel have been incapable of doing what titanium did? Here's a quote from an article I have clipped from the local paper:
" 'The strip that should have been in stainless steel turned out to be made of titanium, a stronger alloy that made the plane's tire burst and set off a chain reaction that led to the Concorde crash,' said Jerome Boursican, a lawyer for a pilots' union that is a civil party to the legal case over the crash."
Seems to me like it's typical B.S. from a hearse-chasing lawyer who is expecting everyone else to be too dumb to know that stainless steel is harder, in general, than titanium. He seems to have seized on the talk of titanium being stronger "ounce-for-ounce" than steel and turned titanium into some sort of super-metal.
What do you all think?
Blue skies,
-Jeffrey
Here's a linked article:
Runway debris a factor in Concorde crash
I want to know what knife-people and metallurgists make out of these claims, which seem to come from the "experts" hired by people suing over the crash. Are they employing mysticism and myth about titanium in order to make illegitimate claims? Would a piece of stainless steel have been incapable of doing what titanium did? Here's a quote from an article I have clipped from the local paper:
" 'The strip that should have been in stainless steel turned out to be made of titanium, a stronger alloy that made the plane's tire burst and set off a chain reaction that led to the Concorde crash,' said Jerome Boursican, a lawyer for a pilots' union that is a civil party to the legal case over the crash."
Seems to me like it's typical B.S. from a hearse-chasing lawyer who is expecting everyone else to be too dumb to know that stainless steel is harder, in general, than titanium. He seems to have seized on the talk of titanium being stronger "ounce-for-ounce" than steel and turned titanium into some sort of super-metal.
What do you all think?
Blue skies,
-Jeffrey