being a law enforcement officer working around salt water and hurricanes..i have owned BOTH knives and have to say Mayo for my money for several reasons, even though both are talonite and titat...
1. utility..the mayo is a user to end all users..you can use it and months later, it looks good as new...not any wear on body or blade
2. lock design..the mayo is a frame lock and the munroe is a liner lock..a frame lock becomes stronger the harder you grip it.
3. blade design..the mayo has a thicker eaiser to remove scratch blade.. not to mention the re-curve it is not a hand rub, i don't think, but very sheen-like in finish that flitz makes look new.
4. clip..the clip of the munore is VERY stiff and made my knife hang almost sideways in my pocket, like a minnow with lips making it VERY hard to draw, while the mayo sits low and easily comes out of the pocket but, also stays put.
5. handle design..with the holes, open back and the rust-proof material, all one has to do, is spray it down and shake it off to clean it up..
to sum it up..mayo is a user and ART to its owner..the munroe is Art with not much utility..this is ONLY my opinion..i would end by saying
the ONLY knife CLOSE to mayo in design utility, material and finish is the m-16 or m-18 in stellite..by Mr. Carson
psss...Tom, you ain't getting no Mr. in the front of your name til i get my other TNT..: )