- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 3,196
Somebody help me out here.
I am a detail guy. As such, I'm a little confused about the naming of the new line. Lots of people seem to be referring to everything in the new line as a Fusion (Fill in Arbitrary Model Name Here). However, to my knowledge, there are only two of the new models with the "Fusion" handle design. The Steel Heart and the Battle Mistress. The other models have been referred to as having the "Tactical" handle design. So, it follows (using my particular brand of logic) that, the SH and BM are "Fusion" models and the others are "Tactical" models. Hence, acronyms employing "F" for fusion would be appropriate for things like FSH or FBM. However, for the new Natural Outlaw, the "F" prefix would not be appropriate as it has the "Tactical" handle... therefor... TNO.
Does this make sense to anyone else or am I just wrapped a little tight?
Could someone who knows something (like someone on the Busse payroll) chime in here and clarify this?
I am a detail guy. As such, I'm a little confused about the naming of the new line. Lots of people seem to be referring to everything in the new line as a Fusion (Fill in Arbitrary Model Name Here). However, to my knowledge, there are only two of the new models with the "Fusion" handle design. The Steel Heart and the Battle Mistress. The other models have been referred to as having the "Tactical" handle design. So, it follows (using my particular brand of logic) that, the SH and BM are "Fusion" models and the others are "Tactical" models. Hence, acronyms employing "F" for fusion would be appropriate for things like FSH or FBM. However, for the new Natural Outlaw, the "F" prefix would not be appropriate as it has the "Tactical" handle... therefor... TNO.
Does this make sense to anyone else or am I just wrapped a little tight?
