- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 14,607
Saturday afternoon was just a great spring day here. After finishing my major chore in the morning (taking down the outside Christmas lights ), I grabbed some toys and headed over to the local woodlot.
That is a stripped Ruck with a ghetto satin, CG FBM with a thinner edge, a FSH with an amazing Ban job - full convex to a shaving sharp zero edge, a Browning Crowell-Barker that had been originally tuned up by Jim Crowell, and the SAR 5.
The SAR 5 is certainly not a chopper, but I found that if you grip it with the thumb and forefinger around the forward rivet hole, you can get a decent snap cut. This knife was not shaving sharp, but I was planning to strip it and reprofile the edge anyway.
The FSH is really great. This sapling was about 1.75", and I was able to chop just shy of clear through. The Crowell-Barker was close in performance, but started with the handicap of not being as sharp as the FSH to begin with, and doesn't have the near mirror polish at the primary edge that Ban puts on his work.
But they were close. Both would chop clean through this branch as it was supported on the log.
I tried a little chop-off; first using the FBM to drop a 3.5" tree, cut it into a 5' section, then try to hold it down on the log while taking 10 chops with each knife in succession.
Based on this limited experiment, the three were roughly equal in terms of the wood cleared/depth of cut. The FSH was the most fluid, having that thinner polished edge, and was still shaving sharp after these minor exertions. But I was getting some pinky bite as I seemed to unconsciously choke back on the grip for more chopping power. Gloves and/or a lanyard in the forward rivet hole would help. The FBM was the least sharp of the three, and had the thickest edge profile, but held it's own here due to the greater mass. The Crowell-Barker is quite impressive for costing only 20 - 25% of the the Busse blades. I guess being designed by two Cutting Competition champions has some benefits. Once I get this sharper and give the edge some polish it will be even better.
I didn't see any deer this time, but the trails were full of tracks.
Last year in May I was wandering this same patch and scared up this guy and a buddy
That is a stripped Ruck with a ghetto satin, CG FBM with a thinner edge, a FSH with an amazing Ban job - full convex to a shaving sharp zero edge, a Browning Crowell-Barker that had been originally tuned up by Jim Crowell, and the SAR 5.
The SAR 5 is certainly not a chopper, but I found that if you grip it with the thumb and forefinger around the forward rivet hole, you can get a decent snap cut. This knife was not shaving sharp, but I was planning to strip it and reprofile the edge anyway.
The FSH is really great. This sapling was about 1.75", and I was able to chop just shy of clear through. The Crowell-Barker was close in performance, but started with the handicap of not being as sharp as the FSH to begin with, and doesn't have the near mirror polish at the primary edge that Ban puts on his work.
But they were close. Both would chop clean through this branch as it was supported on the log.
I tried a little chop-off; first using the FBM to drop a 3.5" tree, cut it into a 5' section, then try to hold it down on the log while taking 10 chops with each knife in succession.
Based on this limited experiment, the three were roughly equal in terms of the wood cleared/depth of cut. The FSH was the most fluid, having that thinner polished edge, and was still shaving sharp after these minor exertions. But I was getting some pinky bite as I seemed to unconsciously choke back on the grip for more chopping power. Gloves and/or a lanyard in the forward rivet hole would help. The FBM was the least sharp of the three, and had the thickest edge profile, but held it's own here due to the greater mass. The Crowell-Barker is quite impressive for costing only 20 - 25% of the the Busse blades. I guess being designed by two Cutting Competition champions has some benefits. Once I get this sharper and give the edge some polish it will be even better.
I didn't see any deer this time, but the trails were full of tracks.
Last year in May I was wandering this same patch and scared up this guy and a buddy