TOPS-Buck Folder ?

Not if it only comes in the Tanto. I guess a guy could round off the tanto point. I don't mind a heavy Tanto fixed blade.
 
I like it, but no more liner-locks for this kid. I own around 20 of them, and have had lock failure with every one at one time or another.
 
I wont be, but I will be getting a whisper, I just found that knife, and I think I am in love, don't tell my ladie.....:D
whis4.jpg
 
I wont be, but I will be getting a whisper, I just found that knife, and I think I am in love, don't tell my ladie.....:D
whis4.jpg

"HOTLINKING IMAGES IS A THEFT"......What the hell? Posting pics of knives on this forum is a great way to advertise...... I think TOPS has started punching to many holes in their overpriced steel.
 
Ehhh.... It's OK I'm not a fan of Buck knives nor TOPS extremely overpriced 1095 steel. I don't think I will ever consider getting this knife.
 
"HOTLINKING IMAGES IS A THEFT"......What the hell? Posting pics of knives on this forum is a great way to advertise...... I think TOPS has started punching to many holes in their overpriced steel.

oh wow, theft of what???


F tops, now I wont buy from them..eesh
 
I'm mostly concerned about the position of the thumbstuds. They look to protrude pretty far out, and they are right on the blade grind. Makes sharpening to a lower angle impossible without grinding the thumbstuds.
 
Its not to my liking but tops folders are high quality or at least my thunder hawk is. Every time a tops thread comes up someone always says overpriced 1095, I guess you should go back to buying Busses then.
 
It looks too bulky and seem to have a thick grind - folders are for cutting,not prying :D - I'll stick with the 110 :)
 
ATS-34, nice steel. Anything else positive?

1] Has pocket clip – sometimes handy
2] Has thumb stud – sometimes handy
3] I do prefer locking liners over a Lockback
4] Appears to be a great design for a plant dibbling – but why didn't they stay with their old beater
steel for that. ATS-34 can be used to make brilliant cutting instruments. Given the cutting power of this knife is appears completely hobbled by the design that steel seems totally wasted. If that is true it follows one would be shelling out $150 [after the intro price] for a material that could never realize its potential.

Notes:

Apart from dibbling it looks like another spastic offering. I'm trying to overlook the tacky looking holes in the blade 'cos there may be a purpose for them that exceeds my intellect, but still. And most salient to me - it looks to have really low cutting power. I think a 12yr old fanatic could have spent between christmas and now edge whittling cotton wool fibers with it yet finds that even a cheapo Gerber would offer such an improvement in cutting power and user comfort it would consummately annihilate it as a cutting instrument. Yup, 154CM, very similar indeed to ATS-34, at between .33 and .25 the price, that in a real world design is going to piss on it and pay for its taxi home. Even if they cost the same I know which ones I'd hand out to a troop and it aint the Tops one.
 
Back
Top