Trying to understand/refine my quenching process better.

Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
133
Specifically, with "air hardening" steels, and cryo treatment.

One thing I have been curious about in my process, is WHEN exactly to cryo. For example, the write-up on Larren's site says "Delay between quenching and cold treatments, interrupted quenching, or tempering prior to cold treatments all stabilize austenite making less of it transform during cold treatments." I know Roman Landes also emphasized this a great deal, too. But what I have always wondered, is at what point should you put your blade in Cryo. I usually wait until it is just warm to the touch (Martensite Finish, according to my understanding), and then I put it in LN2. But should I be putting it in sooner than that?

Also, I've only ever done cryo for 30 minutes, since Landes always said that it doesn't benefit from a soak longer than that. But it seems like most people soak for much longer than that, some people even over night! Does soaking for longer periods have any affect on RA stabilization?

Another thing I haven't been able to get satisfying answers to, is why exactly you need to interrupt an oil quench with these steels? So you cool to below 1000F where pearlite can't form, but then why do you need to slow the quench between 1000F and oil temp? Does it have to do with martensite formation? But even if it did, isn't that process started at 400F? But then why don't we interrupt closer to 400F instead of right below 1000 then? Also, why don't you interrupt a plate quench? Or even further, what if you interrupted oil quench and then plate quenched to MF temp?

I've also had people tell me that they think aluminum plate quenching is almost as fast as oil quenching. But if that's the case, then I would think that there really isn't much difference between an uninterrupted oil quench and a plate quench. Unless the sole reason for an interrupted quench is to prevent warpage, which is something I have also wondered.

In the case of what I usually quench, with blades roughly 100 thousandths thick, (AKS Z-Wear, or 3V), they go from 1950 to 900F in about 2.5 to 3 seconds of quenching in 175F Citgo 521 (16 second oil "medium" speed oil.). Is aluminum much slower than that?

Also, another question I have had, is why do people have better results quenching in plates rather than still air, if the steel supposedly only needs to cool in minutes, not seconds to fully harden? I've been told in previous posts about interrupted oil quenching, that there is no benefit over plate quenching due to the hardenability of the steel. So then it leads me to the above question.

I've also wondered if the differences in quench speeds has more to do with carbide formation, which is something I understand very little about.

I have been trying to get my hands on a good hardness tester to really do a bunch of my own testing, but ultimately I still wish I knew exactly what was going on in the process, and why I am doing what I am doing! But y'all can bet I will post my findings of oil quench vs. plate quench, once I get a tester! I'd love to get my hands on a Rams 30-R but they seem pretty rare!
 
Quench speed doesn't have anything to do with carbide formation.


Plates vs Oil?
I use plates because It quenches faster than oil when you use foil to protect from decarb.


I did two coupons of rex121, same austenitizing temp and time, both foil wrapped. One plate quenched one quenched in parks 50 fast oil.

The foil created a barrier between the Rex and the oil that made it slower than it should be.

Aluminum plates with forced air in-between was faster to room temp.

Both were the same hardness AQ after a 1 hour cryo. Perhaps a difference before cryo but the time in-between quench and cryo is sensitive so I test AQ after cryo always

There may be a difference in RA between them at the same hardness which is curious.
Unfortunately I was quoted $760 to test for X-ray diffraction to measure RA % to satisfy curiosity. Being purdent, I'd say the plate quench is superior for a steel wrapped in foil that has high hardenability. 52100? I use parks 50.

So don't overthink it.

Air hardening steels get plates.

Oil hardening steels get the wet stuff.



I recommend reading Larrin's 3 part cryo article again and take some notes, there was a lot of hard work that was put into that and it's FREE and I see a lot of answers to your questions in that article.

There is also an article on Carbides that he did that can help explain why there are no carbides made during the quench.
 
Thanks for the info about quenching in foil! I actually used to do it that way, and never realized it was slower!

But now I use Condursal Z1100 coating so the foil is no longer a factor. It's an oil quencher's best friend!
 
I'd avoid tunnel vision on super duper turbo speed quenching. There are more important features that control the hardness, strength and mechanical properties of the steel than getting an extra second of turbo quench speed in steels that have high hardenability.

If your prior processing and austenitizing time and temps are trash than the speed of light won't save you.

Thanks for the info about quenching in foil! I actually used to do it that way, and never realized it was slower!

But now I use Condursal Z1100 coating so the foil is no longer a factor. It's an oil quencher's best friend!
 
Well, as I've told people in the past, my main reason for preferring it is so that I can grind any bevel type easily before the blade is hardened.

But also Roman Landes quenches his 3v in oil, so there's that.

But I have long since realized that I will have to test it for myself to be satisfied. I have already had this discussion on this forum fairly recently, and I'm not trying to just rehash all of that. I get that plate quenching is preferable for most people, and that's not really what I am trying to discuss here.

In this case, I'm more interested in the answers to my questions on cryo, and also understanding what's happening in the process that makes an interrupted quench necessary. Even if an interrupted oil quench is not preferable, why is it done when quenching in oil?
 
Well, as I've told people in the past, my main reason for preferring it is so that I can grind any bevel type easily before the blade is hardened.

But also Roman Landes quenches his 3v in oil, so there's that.

But I have long since realized that I will have to test it for myself to be satisfied. I have already had this discussion on this forum fairly recently, and I'm not trying to just rehash all of that. I get that plate quenching is preferable for most people, and that's not really what I am trying to discuss here.

In this case, I'm more interested in the answers to my questions on cryo, and also understanding what's happening in the process that makes an interrupted quench necessary. Even if an interrupted oil quench is not preferable, why is it done when quenching in oil?

An interrupted quench is helpful for complex shapes that cannot be plate quenched. You want a fast quench down to 900f-1000f, then air cooling after that. This minimizes stress on the steel from the martensite transformation. The second half of the transformation imparts the greatest stress, which is why we use parks 50 instead of brine with water hardening steels. Parks 50 is as fast as brine for the first half of the quench, but slower for the second half. This prevents the cracking we see with brine.

The ideal would be high temp salts for austentizing, then lower temp salts for the quench to 900f, air cool, then cryo. The benefits in our simple shapes and thin stock would be minimal, if any at all. Even with our hobbyist equipment, Larrin’s testing has shown we meet and at times exceed hardness and toughness in the datasheets.
 
Ok, so if the martensite formation begins at about 400F, does that mean that you then have a good amount of leeway to interrupt the quench, as long as it's below 1000 but above 400?

I've spent a great deal of time testing quench times with a stop watch, and trying to nail down the most accurate interruption time, but the glow of 1000F steel is hard to detect, especially with ignited oil on the blade, and fractions of a second mean hundreds of degrees. If I could interrupt at 800F or 700F with no ill effects, it would help insure I get below the nose.

Ideally I'd love for salt baths, since that seems to be the best solution. But my wife was NOT happy with the notion when I presented it to her, so alas I have to stick with what I have!

One thing I did notice, is that the Z-Wear data sheet mentions nothing about interrupting the oil quench. But I still figure it's expected, since this is an "air hardening" steel.
 
One thing I have been curious about in my process, is WHEN exactly to cryo. For example, the write-up on Larren's site says "Delay between quenching and cold treatments, interrupted quenching, or tempering prior to cold treatments all stabilize austenite making less of it transform during cold treatments."

I've seen some data somewhere (probably on Larren's site) that show a measurable but small stabilization with a 1 hour wait between quench and cryo. Beyond that, I have not seen any data, and probably the difference starts to get small enough that measuring becomes a problem. In practice, I can go from the oven to the LN2 in about 5 minutes, so I suspect there's very little to gain from trying to push this even further.

It's not uncommon for me to pull the blades out of the plates when they're still worm (maybe 110F), I don't think it matters much, but in order to save some LN2, I cool them in water first, dry them with compressed air, and then they goin into the dewar.

If for whatever reason you need to delay the cryo treatment, keep in mind that austenite stabilization is a diffusion process, and hence it is temperature dependent. The colder you can store your blades in the interim, the better. Maybe you can put them in the fridge.
 
As someone who works with z wear I can certainly see the desire to grind bevels first and then quench in oil

the steel is miserable to grind and especially when you’re doing a 10 inch kitchen knife with a tall heel there’s so much area to grind, not to mention the number of belts used up.

but given that a knife build takes X number of hours I’m thinking that grinding the bevels first and oil quenching might save an hour total.... and I’m not sure how much time additional I’d spend in straightening

anyway I have only plate quenched Z wear. It cools right away and then you cut open the foil and then you hold it in your hand and then you put it in the liquid nitrogen right away. I do it for an hour or so but I’ve also left it in overnight with no effects.

M Mobius1 curious what you are trying to gain with all this questioning and testing... Not trying to be rude but it does seem like you are overthinking this and reaching for some extreme that is past the point of diminishing returns

and if you want any of your coupons hardness tested you’re welcome to send them to me and I’d be happy to do that
 
As someone who works with z wear I can certainly see the desire to grind bevels first and then quench in oil

the steel is miserable to grind and especially when you’re doing a 10 inch kitchen knife with a tall heel there’s so much area to grind, not to mention the number of belts used up.

but given that a knife build takes X number of hours I’m thinking that grinding the bevels first and oil quenching might save an hour total.... and I’m not sure how much time additional I’d spend in straightening

anyway I have only plate quenched Z wear. It cools right away and then you cut open the foil and then you hold it in your hand and then you put it in the liquid nitrogen right away. I do it for an hour or so but I’ve also left it in overnight with no effects.

M Mobius1 curious what you are trying to gain with all this questioning and testing... Not trying to be rude but it does seem like you are overthinking this and reaching for some extreme that is past the point of diminishing returns

and if you want any of your coupons hardness tested you’re welcome to send them to me and I’d be happy to do that

Isn't this type of questioning and testing common for many knifemakers? What has surprised me is how little people have tested oil quenching, when other things that probably have even less impact have been tested to great lengths.

The few instances I've seen any sort of comparison made by someone through testing, they did not do the oil quench optimally.

Also, it's the method that best fits my system of knifemaking, and I want to be sure I am doing it correctly. Where I can find a hundred videos about plate quenching knives, I can't find a single one about interrupted oil quenching air hardening steels, so I don't exactly have much information to dig from.

I have actually thought of taking you up on your offer about testing blanks. I had actually been waiting on my new oven getting here before testing, which was delayed thanks to Evenheat shutting down for Covid. But I finally got it, and literally just today got some quench plates delivered. If I can't find a tester soon, I'll reach out to you.

Obviously there is more to it than just testing hardness, but it will at least give me more insight, and help me find out the most optimal parameters for the oil quench.

As for the plates, they are 1× 4.5 × 16 inch aluminum, I believe. I figured that should handle any type of knife I will be making! And I will be blowing compressed air between them as well. I will probably quench in steel foil though instead of Condursal, to at least save me that extra step (since I normally wrap in foil first anyways, for stress relief.).

As for cryo soak times, according to Roman Landes - "Extensive soak time is not necessary since the process runs at hyper sonic speeds." He recommended 30 minute soak, which is what I have always done. But it seems like pretty much everyone on these forums soaks for 1 hour or more! I know some testing was done with this and Z-Wear, but none of the tests were done as short as 30 minutes, so I have wondered.
 
Isn't this type of questioning and testing common for many knifemakers? What has surprised me is how little people have tested oil quenching, when other things that probably have even less impact have been tested to great lengths.

The few instances I've seen any sort of comparison made by someone through testing, they did not do the oil quench optimally.

Also, it's the method that best fits my system of knifemaking, and I want to be sure I am doing it correctly. Where I can find a hundred videos about plate quenching knives, I can't find a single one about interrupted oil quenching air hardening steels, so I don't exactly have much information to dig from.

I have actually thought of taking you up on your offer about testing blanks. I had actually been waiting on my new oven getting here before testing, which was delayed thanks to Evenheat shutting down for Covid. But I finally got it, and literally just today got some quench plates delivered. If I can't find a tester soon, I'll reach out to you.

Obviously there is more to it than just testing hardness, but it will at least give me more insight, and help me find out the most optimal parameters for the oil quench.

As for the plates, they are 1× 4.5 × 16 inch aluminum, I believe. I figured that should handle any type of knife I will be making! And I will be blowing compressed air between them as well. I will probably quench in steel foil though instead of Condursal, to at least save me that extra step (since I normally wrap in foil first anyways, for stress relief.).

As for cryo soak times, according to Roman Landes - "Extensive soak time is not necessary since the process runs at hyper sonic speeds." He recommended 30 minute soak, which is what I have always done. But it seems like pretty much everyone on these forums soaks for 1 hour or more! I know some testing was done with this and Z-Wear, but none of the tests were done as short as 30 minutes, so I have wondered.

the issue is that solving one issue with the oil creates other more difficult issues with protecting from decarb, which you addressed. Most of us found the trade offs not worth it, considering plate quenching meets the needed quench speed. I have contemplated oil interrupted quenching, and even thought of using nitrogen gas as an inert atmosphere in my kiln. I will likely try that with nitrogen steels, but others have tried and found it wasn’t worth the hassle. Secondly, warp is an issue that plate quenching mostly solves. If the interrupted quench is really something you want to do, get multiple salt pots and do it right. I can’t think of any way to interrupt the quench consistently into oil.

Regarding cryo, if the dewar is full, 15 min is probably enough, but if it’s almost empty, the atmosphere takes longer to transfer heat than liquid does, so most of us use 1h. We found with Z-wear that long soaks to go for eta carbides made no difference in toughness or hardness.

I think experimenting is great. Pretty much everyone here knows that about me. I have been contemplating your questions for about four years. Some people have been contemplating for decades. If there was a better (and consistent, without the risks of salt pots) way than plate quenching and grinding post heat treat, we would be all over it.

I suggest you make some coupons for different heat treat protocols and send them to Larrin for impact testing. See if there is improvement from what we got with plate quenching. If I honestly thought I was leaving even 5% performance on the table, I would find a way to make it work. I believe, but am quite open to being proven wrong, that the difference will be within the range of noise in the data. Plate quenching is fast enough for these steels. The only advantage is grinding before heat treat. The $4000.00 or more salt pots would cost me will pay for a lot of quality belts.
 
I looked into using inert gas in the oven, but that's when I settled on the Condursal. But I believe that's how Landes said he did his 3v, though he also definitely said that salt baths are superior.

In regards to salt baths, he also said the main reason they are superior is because you can cut your soak times by about 1/3, which results in better aus-grain.

When I do my testing, I will go ahead and record the process too just so everyone can make sure I'm not doing anything incorrectly. I plan on doing the plate quench blanks today.

As for my interrupted quenching process, as I mentioned earlier, what I did was simply quench a bazillion times with a stop watch to get a good handle on the time it takes to go black (In the dark.). I may do some more testing with a laser thermometer too. I'm curious to know how quickly the temperature drops beyond 900F.

When I get a hardness tester I will also test the differences in quench times.

Another thing I thought was interesting, in the case of Z-Wear, according to their data sheet, the way I read it, it sounds like 1300F is the nose for quenching. I'd like to test interrupting while the steel is still barely glowing, as well.
 
What are you wanting to gain with interrupted oil quenching of Zwear?

Is there a specific goal?

M Mobius1
 
I explained why in post #5 already.

I also want to learn more about the process because there is so little information about it. I've been interrupting my quench for years, and didn't even know why.

Initially I oil quenched because I filed my bevels so grinding post HT was not an option, and because Landes recommended it, saying you get greater volume fraction of martensite. Then it just became business as usual for me.

But there has always been so little information about it, and even posting about it occasionally over the years, has essentially got me almost nowhere, since few seem to really understand it.

Ultimately, when almost every data sheet I read for air hardening steels mentions oil quenching as an option, I couldn't help but give it consideration, even if I normally plate quenched.
 
I explained why in post #5 already.

I also want to learn more about the process because there is so little information about it. I've been interrupting my quench for years, and didn't even know why.

Initially I oil quenched because I filed my bevels so grinding post HT was not an option, and because Landes recommended it, saying you get greater volume fraction of martensite. Then it just became business as usual for me.

But there has always been so little information about it, and even posting about it occasionally over the years, has essentially got me almost nowhere, since few seem to really understand it.

Ultimately, when almost every data sheet I read for air hardening steels mentions oil quenching as an option, I couldn't help but give it consideration, even if I normally plate quenched.


As I noted, oil interrupted quenches are for complex shapes, like screw compressors, turbines etc.

I get that you do bevels pre heat treat, which would be the only reason to do so with thin, simple shapes like our application.
 
Back
Top