Hello,
I'm trying to learn to sharpen blades, so far I have a lansky and a sharpmaker. I have decent success with both (on an endura). I now have a cqc7 and a crkt m16 that I want to sharpen. The emerson is a chisel grind, the m16 looks like it is a chisel, but the factory says otherwise. My question is that both the crkt folks and the emerson page (where there are photos of him sharpening a commander with some type of diamond rod) advise to sharpen by pulling the blade back across the stone/rod vs "cutting" into the stone. The both then recommend stropping (sp?)...a legal pad cardboard seeming to get a lot of recommendations. What are the pros and cons to pulling vs cutting into the stone or does it matter at all? Also, the lansky has a 30 degree setting (for the cqc7...though I understand it is slightly different than the factory 30 degrees)...what would be the best way to sharpen the cqc7 with the sharpmaker? Thanks in advance...
Howard
I'm trying to learn to sharpen blades, so far I have a lansky and a sharpmaker. I have decent success with both (on an endura). I now have a cqc7 and a crkt m16 that I want to sharpen. The emerson is a chisel grind, the m16 looks like it is a chisel, but the factory says otherwise. My question is that both the crkt folks and the emerson page (where there are photos of him sharpening a commander with some type of diamond rod) advise to sharpen by pulling the blade back across the stone/rod vs "cutting" into the stone. The both then recommend stropping (sp?)...a legal pad cardboard seeming to get a lot of recommendations. What are the pros and cons to pulling vs cutting into the stone or does it matter at all? Also, the lansky has a 30 degree setting (for the cqc7...though I understand it is slightly different than the factory 30 degrees)...what would be the best way to sharpen the cqc7 with the sharpmaker? Thanks in advance...
Howard