- Joined
- May 12, 2003
- Messages
- 1,606
Just an observation from a maker's viewpoint.
I took a look at the new Tyrade in my local sporting goods store. I was drawn to the Bi-metal look.
It was ok I guess....but it seemed like more of a gimmick than an attempt at making a knife that performs better than a blade with a single steel and exemplary heat treatment.
To each his own. I was impressed by the "flipper" mechaism which was smooth like butter...and the lock was solid...there was no play or wobble.
HOWEVER...(here it comes) when I took look at the blade with a critical eye...the wheels fell off. The blade on this knife was round by a left handed person The ede was not in the center of the blade...
AND worse than that ....the difference in blade materials...caused the person who ground this blade to put a big "wallow" in it. From experience it looks like the difference in 'consistency/hardness' caused the belt to eat away more material in the 154CM than in the D2 edge.
Honestly guys...the series of "obbls" in the blae would have failed this knife had it been sumitted to an ABS panel of judges.
Now I may just be pickng nits..how you spen your bread I entirely your busines...
But if I were shelling out $300 I would want the most basic details
"dead-on"...instead of "sort of".
C'mon Kershaw...get it together.
Shane
I took a look at the new Tyrade in my local sporting goods store. I was drawn to the Bi-metal look.
It was ok I guess....but it seemed like more of a gimmick than an attempt at making a knife that performs better than a blade with a single steel and exemplary heat treatment.
To each his own. I was impressed by the "flipper" mechaism which was smooth like butter...and the lock was solid...there was no play or wobble.
HOWEVER...(here it comes) when I took look at the blade with a critical eye...the wheels fell off. The blade on this knife was round by a left handed person The ede was not in the center of the blade...
AND worse than that ....the difference in blade materials...caused the person who ground this blade to put a big "wallow" in it. From experience it looks like the difference in 'consistency/hardness' caused the belt to eat away more material in the 154CM than in the D2 edge.
Honestly guys...the series of "obbls" in the blae would have failed this knife had it been sumitted to an ABS panel of judges.
Now I may just be pickng nits..how you spen your bread I entirely your busines...
But if I were shelling out $300 I would want the most basic details
"dead-on"...instead of "sort of".
C'mon Kershaw...get it together.
Shane