- Joined
- Jul 20, 2014
- Messages
- 19
I know that UHMW is a fairly well known material. I first became acquainted with it in ME101-materials science class a few years ago.
After messing around with this little cheapo Ganzo 717, I looked at the nylon washers and wondered if I could find some brass or silicone bronze/ phosphor bronze replacements. After taking some rough measurements of the bushings (I.D. 0.234-0.24" for non interference fit O.D. ~0.5" Thickness 0.0195") and finding no exact fits on McMaster-Carr, my mind wandered a bit and I thought of UHMW.
A quick search on McMaster-Carr for a suitable washer yielded a part #95649A232 as most suitable option for a blade pin - bushing non interference fit. (I.D. 0.26", O.D. 0.5", Thickness Min./Max. 0.02"/0.04") The thickness may be a bit excessive, but may be able to be amended with some polishing.
I decided to measure my BM-553's phosphor bronze washers. I found the following measurements:
I.D. 0.217"-0.22"
O.D. 0.6"
Thickness 0.025"
I'm wondering if UHMW's exceptional wear resistance, low environmental interactivity, and low coefficient of friction would make it a suitable replacement bushing.
Thoughts?
-Lewis
After messing around with this little cheapo Ganzo 717, I looked at the nylon washers and wondered if I could find some brass or silicone bronze/ phosphor bronze replacements. After taking some rough measurements of the bushings (I.D. 0.234-0.24" for non interference fit O.D. ~0.5" Thickness 0.0195") and finding no exact fits on McMaster-Carr, my mind wandered a bit and I thought of UHMW.
A quick search on McMaster-Carr for a suitable washer yielded a part #95649A232 as most suitable option for a blade pin - bushing non interference fit. (I.D. 0.26", O.D. 0.5", Thickness Min./Max. 0.02"/0.04") The thickness may be a bit excessive, but may be able to be amended with some polishing.
I decided to measure my BM-553's phosphor bronze washers. I found the following measurements:
I.D. 0.217"-0.22"
O.D. 0.6"
Thickness 0.025"
I'm wondering if UHMW's exceptional wear resistance, low environmental interactivity, and low coefficient of friction would make it a suitable replacement bushing.
Thoughts?
-Lewis