- Joined
- Jan 27, 2000
- Messages
- 615
Part One
This is my feeble attempt to help clarify some of the apparent confusion in the thread entitled "Rope Cutting Record", which took a turn and drifted off into the ABS Cutting Competition -- something completely different. For those interested, the link to that thread is: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=275055
I have opted to put my views on the subject in a speparate thread in order to allow the other thread to return to it's original discussion, which was the rope cutting record.
#####
Man, the ABS sure does seem to get tied to the whipping post from time to time. It makes me sad. Guys, if it weren't for the ABS and the good, caring people associated with it, many of us would not be where we are today. In fact, I think in large part that the industry itself would not be where it is today if not for this fine organization. Please note the phrase "in large part". A fellow has to be very careful with his words any more. I am not saying that the ABS is the "only" reason for the boom in the industry, but that it has played a crucial role. Now let's "cut" to the competition ...
While I in no way represent the ABS in any official capacity, I was in the first ABS cutting competition ever held, so I do know enough about it to discuss how and why the whole thing got started. It started at the Piney Woods Hammer-in at Old Washington, Arkansas some years ago.
The purpose was simple. For one thing it provided some fun for the crowd, to actually watch the makers push their blades and see what they could do. Another very important purpose which falls in perfect alignment with the philosophies of the ABS is that it served as a teaching tool for the participants.
If I may, I'll take a moment and step back even farther in time to help this make even more sense. Jimmy Crowell and Jerry Fisk had been doing similar tests with their blades probably since some 18 years ago or better. I really can't say for sure exactly when they started doing this since I wasn't there. These tests helped them realize how to improve the performance of their blades. It was an invaluable teaching tool for them, for testing various heat treating methods, edge geometry, edge holding ability, blade shape, blade strength and toughness, balance, handle design, etc.
Now jump ahead many years. These guys could have kept all the knowledge they'd gained to themselves, but of course one of the philosophies of the ABS is to share the knowledge. The idea came up about having a little competition at the Hammer-in. It would be entertaining to the crowd, as well as fun and educational for the participants. If a maker's blade did not fair too well at any particular event, or if it failed completely during the competition, the Masters could help the participant understand what had gone wrong and how to resolve the issue, to make a better blade.
I honestly can't remember whether or not the first competition had a plaque/trophy/medal for the winner, but the idea was at some time presented somewhere along the line, to help sweeten the pot for the participants so-to-speak.
As we progressed through the years the competition became a major part of the Hammer-in's, both for the crowd and the makers. People started to really take notice. So it became obvious that a set of guidelines should be put into place to insure a level playing field in the competitions. The events have been tweaked along the way through the years in an attempt to further the evening of the playing field.
Here is a prime example. This is a photo sent to me by a friend. It is to the best of my knowledge, from the first ABS cutting competition ever held. At the very least it is from one of the first two or three. The two competitors shown here are Bill Moran in the foreground (obviously), and yours truly along side him.
As you can see, at that time the 2x4 chop was done with the participants holding the their own 2x4's. As time passed, we became aware that in some circumstances a larger, stronger person "could" have a slight edge over a smaller competitor in this event by leaning into the board. These days the 2x4's are instead, secured horizontally and supported by 2x6's, which forces the participant to completely chop through the board. Now the event is on a much more even ebb regardless of the participant's size and strength. The point is that the ABS does in fact try to keep things fair and square for all participants. As we go along, more changes can probably be expected with respect to fairness, safety, and so on.
This is my feeble attempt to help clarify some of the apparent confusion in the thread entitled "Rope Cutting Record", which took a turn and drifted off into the ABS Cutting Competition -- something completely different. For those interested, the link to that thread is: http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=275055
I have opted to put my views on the subject in a speparate thread in order to allow the other thread to return to it's original discussion, which was the rope cutting record.
#####
Man, the ABS sure does seem to get tied to the whipping post from time to time. It makes me sad. Guys, if it weren't for the ABS and the good, caring people associated with it, many of us would not be where we are today. In fact, I think in large part that the industry itself would not be where it is today if not for this fine organization. Please note the phrase "in large part". A fellow has to be very careful with his words any more. I am not saying that the ABS is the "only" reason for the boom in the industry, but that it has played a crucial role. Now let's "cut" to the competition ...
While I in no way represent the ABS in any official capacity, I was in the first ABS cutting competition ever held, so I do know enough about it to discuss how and why the whole thing got started. It started at the Piney Woods Hammer-in at Old Washington, Arkansas some years ago.
The purpose was simple. For one thing it provided some fun for the crowd, to actually watch the makers push their blades and see what they could do. Another very important purpose which falls in perfect alignment with the philosophies of the ABS is that it served as a teaching tool for the participants.
If I may, I'll take a moment and step back even farther in time to help this make even more sense. Jimmy Crowell and Jerry Fisk had been doing similar tests with their blades probably since some 18 years ago or better. I really can't say for sure exactly when they started doing this since I wasn't there. These tests helped them realize how to improve the performance of their blades. It was an invaluable teaching tool for them, for testing various heat treating methods, edge geometry, edge holding ability, blade shape, blade strength and toughness, balance, handle design, etc.
Now jump ahead many years. These guys could have kept all the knowledge they'd gained to themselves, but of course one of the philosophies of the ABS is to share the knowledge. The idea came up about having a little competition at the Hammer-in. It would be entertaining to the crowd, as well as fun and educational for the participants. If a maker's blade did not fair too well at any particular event, or if it failed completely during the competition, the Masters could help the participant understand what had gone wrong and how to resolve the issue, to make a better blade.
I honestly can't remember whether or not the first competition had a plaque/trophy/medal for the winner, but the idea was at some time presented somewhere along the line, to help sweeten the pot for the participants so-to-speak.
As we progressed through the years the competition became a major part of the Hammer-in's, both for the crowd and the makers. People started to really take notice. So it became obvious that a set of guidelines should be put into place to insure a level playing field in the competitions. The events have been tweaked along the way through the years in an attempt to further the evening of the playing field.
Here is a prime example. This is a photo sent to me by a friend. It is to the best of my knowledge, from the first ABS cutting competition ever held. At the very least it is from one of the first two or three. The two competitors shown here are Bill Moran in the foreground (obviously), and yours truly along side him.

As you can see, at that time the 2x4 chop was done with the participants holding the their own 2x4's. As time passed, we became aware that in some circumstances a larger, stronger person "could" have a slight edge over a smaller competitor in this event by leaning into the board. These days the 2x4's are instead, secured horizontally and supported by 2x6's, which forces the participant to completely chop through the board. Now the event is on a much more even ebb regardless of the participant's size and strength. The point is that the ABS does in fact try to keep things fair and square for all participants. As we go along, more changes can probably be expected with respect to fairness, safety, and so on.