VeryLittleRationsAndNoSnacks......

[Uncle_Jarvis]

 

[rt014]

Wow...one of those is a lot thicker than the other Nice set o' NICKs.

 

[Progunner]

One of these days Garth will get mine finished. Very nice!

 

[1whobuys]

All I see is little red X's?

 

[Lil' Foo]

How come I can only see little red x's???

I wann see some NICKs!

 

[Uncle_Jarvis]

OK pics should be back.. ..:thumbup:

 

[xaman]

Very NICE! Congrats :thumbup:

 

[jimmyjones]

Great set ! :thumbup:

I'd like to find one of the thins, the XXXL is lousy carving turkey.

 

[Lil' Foo]

I like that #111 thin NICK... Congrats! :thumbup: :thumbup:

 

[rbmcmjr]

The fat ones do a wicked job on a prime rib roast!

 

[resinguy]

Great knives, but you're killing a beautiful rib-eye! :thumbdn:

I would love to get a Thin Nick, no interest in a fatty for the kitchen.

 

[Guyon]

I would love to get a Thin Nick, no interest in a fatty for the kitchen.

+1

Same here. :thumbup:

 

[Solstice]

Very nice! Thin and thick Nicks...sweet. Although, unless my memory is fading (maybe!) I don't recall the Nicks being numbered. Are these along the same lines as the numbered BAIIIs....which I don't believe were considered LEs....hmmmmm, I think we need a new thread on this subject.

 

[papathud]

Nice #One one one!

My Wife uses #36 when she does not want the worry of possibly Damaging one of her Murray Carter knives when chopping some thing tough, or when She does not want to oil the Carbon steel center after use.

The XXXL looks to be a nice small chopper as well, but my Wife does not yet have ine and has to put up with a Large(at least 2 lbs I think) Dexter Cleaver that we affectionatly Call "Ward"(you know, "Mr. Cleaver", Beaver Cleaver and Wally Cleaver's Daddy? From Leave it to Beaver? old TV show from the 60s)

 

[Uncle_Jarvis]

Yea, from what I know all the thin NICK s are numbered.. .
Thanks for all the comments everyone..!!!

Very nice! Thin and thick Nicks...sweet. Although, unless my memory is fading (maybe!) I don't recall the Nicks being numbered. Are these along the same lines as the numbered BAIIIs....which I don't believe were considered LEs....hmmmmm, I think we need a new thread on this subject.