Actually, any NT based machine (NT4 or 2000) running NTFS partitions is inherently virus resistant. The default securities and inherent nature of these partitions prevent many viruses from spreading. Most hackers code viruses assuming a FAT partition, just because FAT has such a large installed base. Once that virus encounters NTFS, it often comes to a screaming halt. Lots of viruses can kill a FAT machine, but will not effect an NT machine. NTFS, while having certain drawbacks, is a huge leap in security over FAT. People who love their FAT based operating systems, and have no wish to learn Unix or Linux or
. Hehehe
..OS/2
feel pretty comfortable with NT based systems.
NT is pretty good, assuming you use NTFS partitions. The second you make a boot or system partition out of FAT, you just killed yourself.
As far as rolling out NT on a network, its actually very smooth. Much smoother than one of the FATs. NT is a natural networker. You just have to know what youre doing. Theres a good amount of prep work that can be done ahead of time to ensure success.
Oh yah. Im speaking of NT Workstation used as a workstation. Im not too hot on NT servers used as anything other than file and print sharing servers. The minute you put a resident running program on one
you better put in for some major on-call overtime. But the critical programs are what AS/400 is for anyways. I just fired up AS/400 Domino email the other day. Wow!!!!
On the Norton subject, I cant remember what version of Norton I tested. I had manufacturers send in samples for me to evaluate. Norton degraded the performance of DOS programs over TCP/IP by an astounding amount. Stuff that took 30 seconds to normally run turned into 4-hour routines. Yuk. This was a couple of years ago. Hopefully Symantec woke up and smelled the coffee.