- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Messages
- 2,696
what's with all the super specific price points when people want high quality? shouldn't you want certain features first, and maybe have a limit on how much you'll spend to get it?
you know the posts, people who say they are looking to spend $400-$475, but don't talk about size, ergonomics, materials, or if they do, only in very basic ways... is it just jewelry at this point?
I mean, I think most of us realize we can get a spyderco or ZT with often better materials and great fit and finish for half that cost compared to many "mid tech" knives. but I understand if you want the certain mid tech design features. but only understanding wanting to spend high dollar amounts with not one clue of what you actually want to use is a bit absurd, no?
is it out of line to recommend a $150 folder when they ask for "more". or should we just humor them by recommending high priced knives, when in reality they probably would have been more happy with a Sage or something?