I sent an e-mail, got a reply.
>>> "Dan Moore" <needleremorse@comcast.net> 7/22/2004 10:02:04 AM >>>
Dear Sir or Madam,
In House Bill 5797, a proposition is made to limit the selection of
those who carry knives. Let me point out that knives are tools, and that
they are used as weapons by criminals. By imposing vague and yet strict
laws upon the people restricting the tools they carry, you serve not to
protect them, but to inconvenience them grossly. Criminals will always
have weapons, whatever they may be. If this law passes, there will still
be people purchasing and carrying illegal knives with criminal intent,
any yet at the same time law-abiding citizens are punished, and in a
sense, held defenseless. By keeping as many knives as possible legal,
you serve to convenience, protect, and reward the people. Criminals can
make everybody into an easy target knowing that they are probably not
carrying a knife, which can be used in a last-ditch attempt for
defense.
Hopefully, you will see this issue with clarity, and make the decision
that is best for Michigan, that their convenience and safety is not
infringed upon by these unnecessary laws.
Sincerely,
Daniel Moore
Mr. Moore:
Thank you for your e-mail to Sen. Cropsey. The request for the bill
came from the
Detroit Police Department due to exotic knives with blades under 3
inches being sold by a gas station to high school kids. Senator
Thomas
(from Detroit) introduced SB 1296 to address this concern;
Representative Smith (also of Detroit) introduced HB 5797. Senate
Bill
1296 has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee; HB 5797 to
the
House Criminal Law Committee.
As you point out, the proposed language is so broad as to potentially
outlaw Swiss army knives, which Sen. Cropsey cannot support.
Consequently, no hearing is scheduled for SB 1296 in the Senate; only
Rep. Van Regenmorter can speak for the House Committee schedule.
Again, your thoughts are appreciated.
John Lazet, Chief of Staff
Sen. Alan Cropsey