Weird 1095 issue

Stuart Davenport Knives

Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Messages
431
So I very very rarely have a problem heat treating a blade, but I just now had an issue. I thought I would pick your brain and see what I can learn. The steel is 1095 from Alpha Knife Supply, only 0.060" thick. Chuck's steel is usually in a ready to harden state when you receive it, and while I think Occam's Razor dictates that I should have just quenched the blade, my protocol doesn't seem like it should have caused the issue. But I'm always learning. The blade in question is only about 8" long, 1" tall, and again only 1/16" thick. I was going to grind slight bevels and shoot for a hamon, but decided with such a thin stock to forgo the hamon and only profile the blade. No bevels ground.

2 thermal cycles. One at 1475°F for 10 minutes, the 2nd cycle 1450°F, 10 minutes. DET anneal 1460°F for 20 minutes down to ~1200°F at ~666°F per hour. Austenitize 1475°F 10 minutes, immediately into 80° P50 quench for about a count of 7, with agitation, and into chilled plates to keep straight. Blade was straight, tempered 2x at 325°F for 64-65HRC. When I say immediately into the quench oil, I mean immediate. Takes me about one and a half seconds to go from oven to oil with my rig. There was no color loss at all from oven to oil. I don't have a ton of experience with shallow hardening steels, but I never have had any heat treat problems with deeper hardening steels from AKS like 52100, 80CrV2, CFV, O1, and of course the air hardening tool and stainless steels. I normally do a few cycles and the DET anneal with those low alloy steels as well. I just want to reiterate I don't "think" this is a steel issue from Chuck. I have never had a problem with his steels.

The problems was that when I started to grind in the flats, I noticed an auto hamon that was just sort of splotchy on the blade. It is definitely NOT decarb, as it is perfectly identical on both sides, and I use a liberal coat of ATP641 on each and every heat, other than tempers of course. I know very well how decarb is almost always the culprit when maker's post questions about "why is my blade soft", but I assure you, this is most definitely auto hamon. Those of you who might have used W2 from another supplier back in the day will know exactly what I am talking about. Soft spots.

The P50 is basically brand new and as per the manufacturer was at the sweet spot of basically room temp, slightly warmer. Being as thin as the stock was, I would think it would just about harden in plates alone!

Whenever I pose a question, I like to give my own possible answers.
1. The steel is fine. Nothing wrong with it. The extra thermal cycles and possibly the anneal made it so shallow hardening that the P50 wasn't fast enough. Maybe.
2. The steel is coarse spheroidized and needs to be normalized. Unlikely, but definitely a possibility.


Meanwhile, to salvage this heat treatment and for peace of mind, I'm going to normalize it at 1650°F and cycling it twice around 1475°F, DET anneal, and try again into an interrupted quench (water for a few seconds then P50).

So like I said, the smart move would have probably been to just austenitize the steel and not try to mess with it much, but my protocol doesn't seem like it should have caused the auto hamon. Just a weird deal.

This should be fun.
 
Per the AKS "1095 Steel Info" page:

"This alloy been properly annealed and is in the soft condition. You do not have to do any non-standard wasteful processes before heat treating."

I think you're spot on with your first assumption. Next time, I'd just heat to 1475F for 10 minutes, then quench. I recently heat treated 36 knives nearly identical to what you're describing and haven't had any issues.
 
Can you check the hardness in and around the splotches to see if you have uneven hardening?
 
Thanks Drew and Hoss for the reply

Harbeer, for grain refinement. Honestly, the steel as I received it probably has a grain structure that would be called "very fine", maybe even "ultra fine", but I just about always thermal cycle steels a few times.

Robert, yeah it is very much uneven hardening. You can even take the corner of a file and dig right into the areas that are soft, and even after tempering, the file just skates off of the hard areas.

This afternoon I did the normalizing, 2x thermal cycles, DET anneal, water quench (no problems), and right now it's in the freezer for a cold treatment. I'll post tomorrow once I get it to the grinder.

Thanks for all the replies.
 
Actually I just checked it right now and this time it is hard all over. The next blade I make from this small sheet that I have will not be cycled or anything, just a quench into P50.

The water quench did cause some warping, and I will have to contend with that (going to try that ball peen hammer technique).

One cool thing I noticed about this thin 1095 from AKS, through all of those heat cycles and the original P50 quench, that knife was as flat as a pancake prior to the water quench! Very stable steel.
 
If you over refine 1095, it can be so fine grained that it will not pass the nose, no matter how fast you quench it. With AKS steel, I SOMETIMES use one grain refinement cycle if I’m going for a hamon, but I just heat treat it as supplied usually.
 
And the verdict is in. Answer # 1 was correct. Even just 2 cycles (and anneal) made the steel so shallow hardening P50 wasn't fast enough. That blade ended up snapping on me while trying to straighten it, so I profiled another one yesterday afternoon and just went straight to the P50 quench. It came out perfect. Hard all over.

So bottom line, guys. Do not cycle AKS 1095. Just quench it.

I made a coupon just to check the grain structure of the steel that was just quenched (no cycles). It's fine. No pun intended. It is just as fine as the knife that was cycled. Under a 40x magnification, I cannot tell the difference.
 
Back
Top