- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 1,746
My favorite knives are made in steels that people think are crappy, but the difference is that mine is a custom blade made in said crappy steel, and they perform amazingly well. I'll list some of these highly underrated steels:
440A stainless - With oil quench and cryo, can reach 59 rc and perform pretty good in edge retention. Tougher and better edge stability than the typical choices like 154CM/S30V/VG-10, it can hold acute edges well (kitchen knives, anyone?). High corrosion resistance too. Unfortunately this steel is almost never heat treated properly, as it is only used in cheap knives that are annoying to sharpen as they burrrrrr.
AUS8A stainless- With oil quench and cryo, can reach 62-63 hrc and outperform 154CM/S30V/VG-10 at their typical 58-60 hrc. Can get really sharp too. Unfortunately it's typically used in cheaper knives at 55-57 rc, and burrrrrrr as you try to sharpen.
12C26/AEB-L "razor steel" - Among the stainless steels it's the most fine-grained and has excellent edge stability due to low carbide volume. At 62-63 hrc this would make an excellent razor steel, so I'm planning to use this steel for my next straight razor. It will have a 11° inclusive angle.
M2 "high speed steel" - It's rarely used for whatever reason, except in limited edition Benchmades. I've found M2 does have SOME corrosion resistance, a bit less than D2 but much more than 1095 or 52100. That black blade coating that scares away knifebuyers is not really neccesary. My M2 knife at 64 rc vastly outperforms D2 in edge retention and is a lot less brittle than D2 at any hardness. Gets super sharp and can hold an acute 16° inclusive edge (My D2 at 60 hrc chips badly at 22°).
1070/1075/1080/1084 - This steel is almost never used in production knives. The as-quenched hardness of this steel at 66 hrc is actually harder than 1095. It's tougher too. The extra carbon in 1095 just forms iron carbides, which slightly increases wear resistance at the expense of toughness. What I don't understand is why 1095 is typically hardened to only 58-60 hrc when 1080 at this same hardness would be tougher. 1080 is easy to heat treat as it is a eutectoid steel, not much can go wrong. You can do it with a torch and get a differentially tempered blade. Does not require cyro unlike 1095, which needs some sort of freezing to get complete austenite conversion.
What else?
440A stainless - With oil quench and cryo, can reach 59 rc and perform pretty good in edge retention. Tougher and better edge stability than the typical choices like 154CM/S30V/VG-10, it can hold acute edges well (kitchen knives, anyone?). High corrosion resistance too. Unfortunately this steel is almost never heat treated properly, as it is only used in cheap knives that are annoying to sharpen as they burrrrrr.
AUS8A stainless- With oil quench and cryo, can reach 62-63 hrc and outperform 154CM/S30V/VG-10 at their typical 58-60 hrc. Can get really sharp too. Unfortunately it's typically used in cheaper knives at 55-57 rc, and burrrrrrr as you try to sharpen.
12C26/AEB-L "razor steel" - Among the stainless steels it's the most fine-grained and has excellent edge stability due to low carbide volume. At 62-63 hrc this would make an excellent razor steel, so I'm planning to use this steel for my next straight razor. It will have a 11° inclusive angle.
M2 "high speed steel" - It's rarely used for whatever reason, except in limited edition Benchmades. I've found M2 does have SOME corrosion resistance, a bit less than D2 but much more than 1095 or 52100. That black blade coating that scares away knifebuyers is not really neccesary. My M2 knife at 64 rc vastly outperforms D2 in edge retention and is a lot less brittle than D2 at any hardness. Gets super sharp and can hold an acute 16° inclusive edge (My D2 at 60 hrc chips badly at 22°).
1070/1075/1080/1084 - This steel is almost never used in production knives. The as-quenched hardness of this steel at 66 hrc is actually harder than 1095. It's tougher too. The extra carbon in 1095 just forms iron carbides, which slightly increases wear resistance at the expense of toughness. What I don't understand is why 1095 is typically hardened to only 58-60 hrc when 1080 at this same hardness would be tougher. 1080 is easy to heat treat as it is a eutectoid steel, not much can go wrong. You can do it with a torch and get a differentially tempered blade. Does not require cyro unlike 1095, which needs some sort of freezing to get complete austenite conversion.
What else?