It seems like every time I turn around, somebody is trying to make a 'better D2'. An example I ran across the other day about Sleipner steel: "Sleipner has improved toughness compared to D2, good wear and chipping resistance" (http://www.zknives.com/knives/steels/sleipner.shtml).
Also, in the super steels category, there are now steels that have as good or better edge holding, similar or better toughness, AND vastly improved stain resistance. Lots of choices available.
Thing is: I still really like D2, despite the more modern alternatives. It takes a great edge if you use the right abrasive, and that edge lasts a LONG time. Like, longer than S30v for example, at least on the knives I have. And sharpened right, with a good blade geometry, it gets great cutting performance.
I'm curious if there are others that still like working with and using D2, and if so: what do you like about it, and what applications do you prefer using it for. Or if you've moved on to other steels on the premise that the only remaining reason to use D2 is lower cost, given the 'improved' alternatives.
Also, in the super steels category, there are now steels that have as good or better edge holding, similar or better toughness, AND vastly improved stain resistance. Lots of choices available.
Thing is: I still really like D2, despite the more modern alternatives. It takes a great edge if you use the right abrasive, and that edge lasts a LONG time. Like, longer than S30v for example, at least on the knives I have. And sharpened right, with a good blade geometry, it gets great cutting performance.
I'm curious if there are others that still like working with and using D2, and if so: what do you like about it, and what applications do you prefer using it for. Or if you've moved on to other steels on the premise that the only remaining reason to use D2 is lower cost, given the 'improved' alternatives.