- Joined
- Nov 20, 2001
- Messages
- 7,353
Hi,
I'm interested in hearing what people look for in a knife. 2 weeks ago, I went to the ABS show, and I think I have refined my criteria as: I want my knife to be the unique work of a maker.
By that, I mean that for me the defining feature of a knife is its design. Not the balance, not the fit, not the quality of the heat treatment - the design.
Let me refine that. I take for granted that most smiths, esp. ABS MS, are careful about their forging & heat treatment. More to the point, I will never test their knife one way or another. Most of my knives are art pieces and not users, although I would certainly assume that they all *could* perform extremely well. Hence, although it's important to me that the knife be functional, I will not be stopped if someone, for example, doesn't use high temp salt baths (which BTW, I deem as a requirement for a top of the line heat treatment nowadays.)
Similarly, although on some knives a sloppy finish will turn me away, I have at least 1 Dan Winkler knife with badly aligned, unsmoothed shoulders at the ricasso. I love this knife - it's totally unique.
With the level of knowledge pervading the knife world nowadays, I think that most knives would "do the trick" if you want to use them. Yes, some are better fitted than others, and some better forged & heat treated. Yet 99.99% of us will never get a chance to really feel the difference. Maybe that is different when choosing a user's knife: some are more securely fitted, stay sharp longer, and have a better designed handle than others.
Design though, makes all the difference. Some makers (Fuegen, Fogg, Hudson, Winkler, Tai Goo, etc...) have developed a keen sense for a unique design. Their work is more than just technical skills and good materials. I find that this aspect, more than any other, will decide of my choice for a knife.
What about yours?
JD
I'm interested in hearing what people look for in a knife. 2 weeks ago, I went to the ABS show, and I think I have refined my criteria as: I want my knife to be the unique work of a maker.
By that, I mean that for me the defining feature of a knife is its design. Not the balance, not the fit, not the quality of the heat treatment - the design.
Let me refine that. I take for granted that most smiths, esp. ABS MS, are careful about their forging & heat treatment. More to the point, I will never test their knife one way or another. Most of my knives are art pieces and not users, although I would certainly assume that they all *could* perform extremely well. Hence, although it's important to me that the knife be functional, I will not be stopped if someone, for example, doesn't use high temp salt baths (which BTW, I deem as a requirement for a top of the line heat treatment nowadays.)
Similarly, although on some knives a sloppy finish will turn me away, I have at least 1 Dan Winkler knife with badly aligned, unsmoothed shoulders at the ricasso. I love this knife - it's totally unique.
With the level of knowledge pervading the knife world nowadays, I think that most knives would "do the trick" if you want to use them. Yes, some are better fitted than others, and some better forged & heat treated. Yet 99.99% of us will never get a chance to really feel the difference. Maybe that is different when choosing a user's knife: some are more securely fitted, stay sharp longer, and have a better designed handle than others.
Design though, makes all the difference. Some makers (Fuegen, Fogg, Hudson, Winkler, Tai Goo, etc...) have developed a keen sense for a unique design. Their work is more than just technical skills and good materials. I find that this aspect, more than any other, will decide of my choice for a knife.
What about yours?
JD