The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
This is where I am exactly. The Balance is a great design, but the Cricket is probably the best package opening knife I've ever used. The Nishijin versions were just discontinued I believe, so if you want one you should snag it now. Carrying mine today:I have a CF Balance and a Nishijin Cricket. I will probably never part with the Balance but I definitely carry the Cricket more. It is a very handy blade shape for sure. I would say opening packages is what it excels at. It has more blade length than the Balance too. The Cricket is also thinner and fits great in a watch pocket.
Yeah, the problem with the Balance and Equilibrium I think is that they always seemed expensive for a small knife, even for a Spyderco, and its one of the reasons they didn't last, I think. A shame because they're cool little knives.FWIW, Knifecenter is blowing out the Equilibrium for $60.
I was trying to find a balance CF and can't for the life of my find one (except a used one going for $333+) so I got to looking around and wondered what you guys think is a good close second?
Yeah, the problem with the Balance and Equilibrium I think is that they always seemed expensive for a small knife, even for a Spyderco, and its one of the reasons they didn't last, I think. A shame because they're cool little knives.
I find the Balance to be the superior design, but it seems too small until you hold it. The Equilibrium was supposed to remedy that, but then it starts competing unfavorably with larger knives.
I would probably carry my mini Tuff more if it were made by Spyderco, because then it would be easier to open, thinner in pocket, have a better steel, and have a tip up clip. It would probably cost more though, but as long as I'm paying that much for knives in general... I'll accept the lock is stronger, but it's overkill for such a small knife anyway.True. I don't see that the Equilibrium can do anything for $60 that my $17 Mini Tuff can't do, and the Mini Tuff is lighter. However, the Mini Tuff loses out on overall thickness and the usual excellent Spyderco fit and finish.
That is true. My biggest gripes have to do with deployment. The slot cutout is far less comfortable than the spyderhole, and the Tri-ad lock is not really an ergonomic design. Basically I'd love for Spyderco to make a knife similar to the Tuff but to their standards.But, the over all design of the Mini Tuff Lite is a bit better. It gives a good hand/blade/task cutting angle. The edge is also very thin so it is a great cutter.
Also, the Spin.
I've only got medium-sized hands, but I find manipulation of the Spin very difficult, much as I like the concept. The Lava--at least the SS version--is appreciably heavier, but has excellent ergos. If you're going to suggest the Mouse, you may as well bring up the Toad as well. The latter also had good ergos, but I never tried a Mouse for size.
Yeah as much as I like small Spydercos, the Spin is a bit small for me. I think it's because the deep could force you into a two finger grip, whereas I can even get 3 fingers on the Manbug.I've only got medium-sized hands, but I find manipulation of the Spin very difficult, much as I like the concept. The Lava--at least the SS version--is appreciably heavier, but has excellent ergos. If you're going to suggest the Mouse, you may as well bring up the Toad as well. The latter also had good ergos, but I never tried a Mouse for size.