Codger_64
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 62,324
Occasionally over the past few years, when I have posted the results of my research and/or observations, people have felt moved to call me an "expert". Sometimes it is in heartfelt appreciation for my sharing knowledge, and sometimes an effort to mock me, or to discredit the information I am sharing.
I don't consider myself an expert, and have repeatedly denied being one. I am aware of a circle of knife industry pundents who are known widely as experts, and they do posess an amazing amount of knowledge of knives, and of knife history etc. They have written many volumes of reference books that collectors take as gospel, give appraisals of knives or knife collections for fees, appear in court as paid recognized experts on knife law matters, and have some business relating to the cutlery field. They make a living from their "expertise" as people in all fields of endevour do. They posess a certain desirable commodity (knowledge) and they sell it. I admire the fact that they have found a way to make a living doing something they love to do, and don't begrudge them one bit.
Well, I was again called an expert in a thread visited by a poster I consider a spammer, again in a weak attempt to mock me. Therefore, the term "expert" IMHO, is a term I abhore. It is as much overused as the term "rare". I have given this quite a bit of thought, and here is a posting I found that explores the question "What is an expert?"
Now, I make no claim to being an expert, and never have in the field of Schrade knives, or knives in general. I am a Master Patent Illustrator, Master Swimming Pool Contractor, with an engineering degree. I make no part of my living selling knives, Schrade memorabilia, or knife knowledge. Other than what I have posted here to share with you for free, I am not a published author of a single book or magazine article, either written by me, or ghost written with my name on it.
What I am is an attentive Schrade knife collector who has done research, examined the knives by buying multiples of a pattern searching for minute engineering changes which can indicate when that particular design variant was made. I've posted here several times my suggestions to other collectors as to where to look for information, how to conduct their own research. There is nothing magical about it, and nothing unique or mystical about acquiring knowledge and arranging references so that you can quickly and accurately retrieve the information when you need it.
It did not take me long to realize that to authoratatively publish all the available information on Imperial Schrade and associated cutleries and their knives, one would have to prepare at least six volumes of materials the size of a Sears and Roebuck catalog, if not the Thomas Register (now up to 16 volumes, see eBay #140021633207).
Codger
I don't consider myself an expert, and have repeatedly denied being one. I am aware of a circle of knife industry pundents who are known widely as experts, and they do posess an amazing amount of knowledge of knives, and of knife history etc. They have written many volumes of reference books that collectors take as gospel, give appraisals of knives or knife collections for fees, appear in court as paid recognized experts on knife law matters, and have some business relating to the cutlery field. They make a living from their "expertise" as people in all fields of endevour do. They posess a certain desirable commodity (knowledge) and they sell it. I admire the fact that they have found a way to make a living doing something they love to do, and don't begrudge them one bit.
Well, I was again called an expert in a thread visited by a poster I consider a spammer, again in a weak attempt to mock me. Therefore, the term "expert" IMHO, is a term I abhore. It is as much overused as the term "rare". I have given this quite a bit of thought, and here is a posting I found that explores the question "What is an expert?"
GreyThumb.Blog Saturday said:What is an expert?
Over at Dispatches from the Culture Wars there is an article on Orson Scott Card's silly intelligent design essay that chooses to examine one particular complaint of Card: his hostility to the "expertism" of "Darwinists."
This has prompted me to write about something I've wanted to write about for a while: just what exactly is an expert, and should we trust them?
A dictionary definition of expert is: a person with a high degree of skill in or knowledge of a certain subject. An expert is someone who knows what they're talking about.
While that definition is true, I think that being a true expert involves something a bit more than what is captured in that definition.
I see an expert as being someone who has applied sustained mental focus toward an area of knowledge or human endeavor and has, in doing so, achieved a special level of understanding. Sustained mental focus means that you apply your full attention to understanding and working with the subject. You "live and breathe" it. You have tacked hard problems, grasped difficult concepts, and spent much time reading and in quiet contemplation. In engineering, an expert is someone who has taken things from inspiration to concept to design to finished product. In scientific areas, an expert is someone who has gone through the full process of the scientific method at least a few times and has made a discovery or two.
The result of sustained mental focus is a combination of factual knowledge, conceptual understanding, and deep intuition about an area of knowledge or human endeavor. One feels entirely comfortable with the subject, and can hold one's own in discussions with other experts without invoking tactics of dishonesty or obscurantism.
An honest expert is also not afraid to say when they don't know or when they don't understand something, and is happy to be enlightened. Real experts aren't afraid to correct themselves or admit when they are wrong. Real expertise breeds this kind of self-confidence.
I also think it's important to say what an expert isn't...
An expert is not necessarily someone with a degree. Someone with a high degree is supposed to be an expert, but this is not guaranteed. It is also possible to get a degree by simply doing what you are told and following others' coattails but without ever truly applying deep mental focus or coming to real understanding. Likewise, it is possible to become an expert on your own (although this is easier in some areas than others) if you are willing to apply sustained mental focus. There are plenty of expert hobbyists, particularly in areas like computers, electronics, visual astronomy, etc. where the tools are within economic reach of private individuals. The strict equation of degrees with expertise is what I call credentialism. In a debate this is a form of appeal to authority.
An expert is also not someone who merely possesses a knowledge of facts and terminology. A person can memorize facts without understanding them and can use terminology without a true appreciation of the underlying concepts. The use of empty but complex terminology is a common feature in pseudoscience and pretentious faux-intellectualism.
Oh, and one more thing... it takes hard work to become an expert.
This last point is important, especially in light of the article I linked to regarding Card's silly bashing of the "expertism" of evolutionary biologists. Experts are perfectly justified in their irritation when some doofus who has put forward no effort toward understanding something makes silly claims and then pays no attention or invokes self-righteousness when corrected.
Now, I make no claim to being an expert, and never have in the field of Schrade knives, or knives in general. I am a Master Patent Illustrator, Master Swimming Pool Contractor, with an engineering degree. I make no part of my living selling knives, Schrade memorabilia, or knife knowledge. Other than what I have posted here to share with you for free, I am not a published author of a single book or magazine article, either written by me, or ghost written with my name on it.
What I am is an attentive Schrade knife collector who has done research, examined the knives by buying multiples of a pattern searching for minute engineering changes which can indicate when that particular design variant was made. I've posted here several times my suggestions to other collectors as to where to look for information, how to conduct their own research. There is nothing magical about it, and nothing unique or mystical about acquiring knowledge and arranging references so that you can quickly and accurately retrieve the information when you need it.
It did not take me long to realize that to authoratatively publish all the available information on Imperial Schrade and associated cutleries and their knives, one would have to prepare at least six volumes of materials the size of a Sears and Roebuck catalog, if not the Thomas Register (now up to 16 volumes, see eBay #140021633207).
Codger