- Joined
- Mar 26, 2004
- Messages
- 24,598
I thought that I had a pretty complete understanding of these 2 blade shapes, but often the two names are used interchangably to describe seperate blade styles. Presumably, because both are straight edged.
Let me see if I've got this right...
A sheepsfoot has a straight edge, with no pointed tip. The "tip" is rounded from the spine down to the edge, and the grind at the tip matches the grind of the rest of the blade. Somewhat like a reverse clip point.
A wharncliffe also has a straight edge, but usually has a tip, or at least more of a tip than a sheepsfoot. Curve from the base of the blade to the tip is much more gradual, taking much, or even all of the blade length to drop to the tip. Also, the spine of the knife follows the drop the entire (or most of) length of the blade, having almost the same thickness at the tip as it does at the base.
Is this correct?
I see sheepsfoots (sheepsfeet?) as rescue style knives a lot because the blunted blade can't stab. A wharncliffe, assuming my presumtions are correct, is still a pretty capable stabber.
Let me see if I've got this right...
A sheepsfoot has a straight edge, with no pointed tip. The "tip" is rounded from the spine down to the edge, and the grind at the tip matches the grind of the rest of the blade. Somewhat like a reverse clip point.
A wharncliffe also has a straight edge, but usually has a tip, or at least more of a tip than a sheepsfoot. Curve from the base of the blade to the tip is much more gradual, taking much, or even all of the blade length to drop to the tip. Also, the spine of the knife follows the drop the entire (or most of) length of the blade, having almost the same thickness at the tip as it does at the base.
Is this correct?
I see sheepsfoots (sheepsfeet?) as rescue style knives a lot because the blunted blade can't stab. A wharncliffe, assuming my presumtions are correct, is still a pretty capable stabber.