I'd be intrested in hearing the logic behind not using the Sawyer Extractor.
I understand the logic behind not cutting a snakebite and not sucking out venom with your mouth but I'm having a hard time understanding why the Extractor is a bad idea. At the worst it seems like it wouldn't do enough to be a treatment in itself.
It seems to me that the Extractor would give diminished results with the passage of time but if it was applied right away that it might do some good.
If one of the major recommendations is to keep the patient calm one of the benefits of the Extractor might be that it would give the victim the sense that something has been done to limit the spread of venom.
I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around some detrimental effect of immediate, localized suction of the bite, with the Extractor. I freely admit that I could be missing something important here, as I am not a doctor. The only thing I can think of is that somehow the suction might increase the blood flow to the area and wash more venom into the system than ordinary circulation would, or that the Extractor would remove, but this is just non-medically qualified conjecture on my part.
I'm bit, I get away from the snake, drop my pack and extract the wound... how have I worsened the situation? Mac