True, but Bill used to say during some of his specials: "I'll let you have it for this price if you test it and post a review for us." (paraphrase)
Reviews are good because they should pick up any possible decline in material- or improvement. But only if they're tested hard. There was a test regime on the HI Web site, I don't even know if it's there anymore, but it was WAY over the top; remember putting all your weight on the blade when the end was stuck in a concrete crack and bending it to ground level?
We'll never get standardized tests, and I'm not sure I'd want them all the same, but a few suggestions as to test procedure might be good. Keep in mind we're not all Cliff Stamps, but you and other engineer types might come up with a few ideas.
Hollowdweller and I both test the edge in Hard Wood. That seems to be the clinch for some blades. Some of you are probably so strong I'm not sure what is fair- when I say I swing the blade hard as I can into the wood and check the edge- what does that mean to one of you martial artists who can bench 500 pounds?
Yvsa used to perform a cut and dig- at the end of his stroke he twist the blade to scrape out the wood. That's gotta be tough on a edge.
I think this is a good idea, Pen, and no matter what each of us do, any work out and conversation about the blades is bound to be a good thing. With more reviews we might have identified the horn handle cracking earlier.
edit- oh- some of us used to test for Rockwell, as did Bill, but many don't have the tools to do that. Hollow is interested in how long a sweet spot is, and what tempering the entire blade length has. I just 'feel' the sweet spot with a stone, as it passes slickly over the hardened area, and wants to dig or engage softer areas.
munk