What's your mental image of the individual companies?

Comeuppance

Fixed Blade EDC Emisssary
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
4,765
They all seem to have their own personalities. For example:

Spyderco: Performance-oriented quality cutting tools. Purpose-built and always trying to make innovative designs and materials affordable. From the original Worker to now, always focused on providing the best cutting tool they can.

Kershaw: Usually more experimental in design than materials, but not afraid to try new things. Like an old cherished American tradition now being lovingly re-imagined by a new generation of Knifemakers. Affordable, friendly, practical, and well-made. An idealized American company given to us by courtesy of Japan’s KAI.

Benchmade: Gentleman's tactical knives. Like a refined and more extravagant Emerson. Befitted to cubicle farm special op tactical daydreamer types but also to people who want interesting and well-designed knives. They look good and they work well. You could use them in combat but you never will.

Emerson: Built for war. They don't pretend to be box cutters and make no concessions to elegance or utility. The handle is simple and grippy. The hardware is simple and easy to adjust. They open literally as fast as you take them out of the pocket. They might not always be perfect , but they will not fail you. Their designs don’t fit my daily life, but I would want nothing else if I was to take a folder into a wilderness or combat situation. I always feel like Emerson begrudginly acknowledges this finicky minority’s complaints about machining tolerances, and would rather we shut up because he designed a war weapon and not an action figure to play with. Not a criticism or a defense, just an perception.

Zero Tolerance: Mission knives. Not letter openers, not something you put in a toolbox, but something you strap to your vest. Confidence and sturdiness. Reliable mechanics. It'll break down a box, but it would rather cut a climbing rope while you freefall into a forest below into a terrorist camp.

Ka-Bar, SOG: Military knives that became cool to the general public. The companies sacrificed quality and materials for prices and market appeasement - like a hardened general that decided to become marketable. Heck, SOG’s frequent endorser, R. Lee Ermey, seems to reflect the same spirit. Once intense and inspiring of respect and awe, now much harder to take seriously but still appreciated and enjoyed.

Svord, Mora, Opinel: Companies that make knives that should replace the market Gerber currently has. Cheap, performance-built and very basic knives with good warranties and prices that make them more than just a reasonable choice. They don’t make flippers, but you’ll never hesitate to scratch them. They don’t use amazing steel, but they use good steel. You buy it and use it. If you try to collect them, you won’t end up with a knife display but you will end up with a toolbox.

Gerber: Really, just stop already.

CRKT: Ambitious to be a star of the knife world. Caught somewhere in between being well-known enough to do well with the general public and having the quality and designs that enthrall the enthusiast market. Not doing extremely well in either market, but always trying new and often radical things whether there was demand or not. They’re like MTech, but respectable and with good quality, but also with seemingly entirely arbitrary pricing structure.

Boker: Covering all angles with their tiered quality structure. Cheap crap at a pawn shop (Magnum) you pick up when you’re twelve, good cutting tools with lots of custom influence but always with the same materials - as if you’re getting the same knife in different flavors (Plus), and mid-tech level production knives with prices to match the quality but not always the materials (Tree). Like a profit-oriented company kept in check by a stern but wise craftsman.

Cold Steel: Designed for hunters, woodsmen, collectors, and mall ninjas. They’re fantasy knives that you can use, they’re no-nonsense bushcraft tools, they’re ridiculous conversation pieces, they’re reliable tools at a price point that reflects the large amounts of refinement and imagination but also the low tier of materials used. Like a Rolex made from FRN, it’ll look good and seem ridiculous, but will also work very well and not break the bank.
 
They all seem to have their own personalities. For example:

Gerber: Really, just stop already.

Cold Steel: Designed for hunters, woodsmen, collectors, and mall ninjas. They’re fantasy knives that you can use, they’re no-nonsense bushcraft tools, they’re ridiculous conversation pieces, they’re reliable tools at a price point that reflects the large amounts of refinement and imagination but also the low tier of materials used. Like a Rolex made from FRN, it’ll look good and seem ridiculous, but will also work very well and not break the bank.

LOLOLOLOL

Where's the Like button? :thumbup:
 
I agree with your evaluation, but I would give ka-bar a separate line from sog.

edit: your thread has a glaring flaw... you failed to list mantis, as we all know you should just take all the positives from these other companies and put them into one, and the fact that they turn you into an all around macho hombre. :smiley_simmons:
now we wait for a foagie to take my post seriously somehow. a friend of mine has a thing for red and he likes the mantis isosceles, so I think i'll buy it for him for his birthday and maybe do a review here.
 
Last edited:
Busse: Built to be the toughest and most robust fixed blades on the market, while still maintaining classic looks. Aimed at wealthy alcoholics that hate any and all forms of wood.
 
Busse: Built to be the toughest and most robust fixed blades on the market, while still maintaining classic looks. Aimed at wealthy alcoholics that hate any and all forms of wood.

That's sig line material right there.
 
Busse: Built to be the toughest and most robust fixed blades on the market, while still maintaining classic looks. Aimed at wealthy alcoholics that hate any and all forms of wood.

Swamp rat, too...

Scrap Yard: Built to be tough as nails, yet still affordable. Simpler designs and materials, but they'll still cut down a forest or open up a bunker if necessary.


Esee:(Regarding their warranty, :p) Because sometimes you want to be able to stop a rocket with your knife and have the maker replace it afterwards.
 
LionSteel: "The King of Solid Knives". Gorgeous and sensuous monolithic tanks! When you must have a full dose of aesthetics to go along with substance and functionality!
 
CRK: Small company with dedicated employees. Mission statement: produce the best possible product line, manufactured to the tightest specifications. Enable knife owners to perform reasonable knife-related duties with unique efficiency. Produce an attractive product; easy to carry and deploy; models available to suit the situation. Product line to last beyond probable client lifetime; customer service provided at lowest cost to periodically renew knife as necessary, per customer request. Always be nice to our customers.
Sonnydaze
 
I know plenty of people who carried a benchmade to war overseas. Its a brand that I would trust my life to.
 
+1. Good summary of CRK.

CRK: Small company with dedicated employees. Mission statement: produce the best possible product line, manufactured to the tightest specifications. Enable knife owners to perform reasonable knife-related duties with unique efficiency. Produce an attractive product; easy to carry and deploy; models available to suit the situation. Product line to last beyond probable client lifetime; customer service provided at lowest cost to periodically renew knife as necessary, per customer request. Always be nice to our customers.
Sonnydaze
 
I'm gonna think about it and come back with a full answer, but the only one I disagree with is ZT. Maybe they started out with mission oriented knives, and do still have some. But now I think that's, in many cases, a marketing gimmick to get people to feel like they are going on missions. Their more recent models have seemed to be 99.99% elegance, high end materials, and design.

And there's nothing wrong with that. There is clearly a huge market for collectors and enthusiasts who prefer/expect/value exotic materials and pretty/novel designs. I like a lotr of their knives.

I just don't think they are really focused on the military/mission thing anymore.

Maybe the nw Emerson collaborations will take them back to their roots.
 
I'm gonna think about it and come back with a full answer, but the only one I disagree with is ZT. Maybe they started out with mission oriented knives, and do still have some. But now I think that's, in many cases, a marketing gimmick to get people to feel like they are going on missions. Their more recent models have seemed to be 99.99% elegance, high end materials, and design.

And there's nothing wrong with that. There is clearly a huge market for collectors and enthusiasts who prefer/expect/value exotic materials and pretty/novel designs. I like a lotr of their knives.

I just don't think they are really focused on the military/mission thing anymore.

Maybe the nw Emerson collaborations will take them back to their roots.

ZT's Facebook page is almost exclusively focused on the military, missions, etc. Their marketing message is at times an incoherent mixed bag. Their high-quality knives are just great and the limited editions use cutting edge design, technology, materials and manufacturing. It's tough to start out in 2006 as a hard-use built like a tank knife company with mostly black blades and handles to then broaden their horizons now. Regardless, I think in time the knives and messages will come into a better focus.
 
Back
Top