- Joined
- Mar 24, 2013
- Messages
- 287
Hi.
Mi real name is Daniel, I'm from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Labour Law Lawyer in the real life.
I started collecting a year and half ago, maybe two years. I had no idea, ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA about knives.
One day I saw a street vendor selling what I now know are cheap chinese auto folders. I was in love at first sight. Shiny, pointy, auto, COOL.
Only AR$40, something next to nothing in US dollaras. Let's say USD4.
Then I move to cheap chinese push daggers.
I have two
Then I started with boker.
Boker armed forces folders I and II, boker armed forces fixed blade tanto, boker tuff.
Then I went for muela knives. Muela is a spanish brand, well known in Argentina, 440 C steel, good finish in general.
Have the Jabali, the Bowie, the Piooner model, two short with big belly skinners.
Then the beker bk2.
Then Zt 0100 fixed blade 3v steel
Then zt 0300
Then fox pro hunter folding, micarta scales, N690co, liner lock and lawks.
Then Bechmade 741 Onslaught.
Soooooooooooooo
I feel that I've "parked" myself in what you could call a set level of knives.
Steel better than 440C or AUS8 (154, S30V, N690Co, 3v)
Locks stronger than liner lock (frame lock, liner wiht lawks, axis)
Handles better than average also (machined g10 or micarta or titanium)
Cool looking
Those qualities is what NOW I define like a "good knife". Not good as in "it fullfills it purpose as knife", but as in "in the current production and semi custom market, they are from the middle up". You have with them most of what current state of the art knife science (?) has to offer today.
I posting this because today I have red every catalog out there, been reading this and other forums for months, been talking with knowledgeable (?) people, been testing my own knives, carrying them, cut myself with them, etc.
And NOW I'm reading things like "yeah, 154cm is a serviceable steel, but SV125 it's better"
Or "M390 es good, but k390 its one order of magnitud better". I've red this last one here, in the spyderco forum, a user asking for a sprint run on them.
And I don't even know yet what m390 is, much less k390.
Sooooooooooooooo
I know this is very subjective, but I would like to hear other subjectivities: when a knife is a good knife? What qualities makes a knife more than just average?
I forsee the extreme tipical answers:
a) A buck 110 420 steel it's more than enough, because of the heat treatment and blade geometry. An average user like you would never tell the difference.
All else is marketing hype.
b) You pay what you get for.
I've detected differences, very clear differences. When you sharpen 420 on a stone, the sound the steel makes it's very different from S30V, and it's harder to sharpen S30V.
154cm has a sharper edge than anything I've been able to produce on a 420.
Where S30V chips, 154cm bends.
And so.
Rambling. Sorry.
What qualities does a knife need in your view to be considered above average?
My next purchase would be a zt0561, to try the blade shape and Elmax steel. And it would meet all of MY criteria.
Mi real name is Daniel, I'm from Buenos Aires, Argentina. Labour Law Lawyer in the real life.
I started collecting a year and half ago, maybe two years. I had no idea, ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA about knives.
One day I saw a street vendor selling what I now know are cheap chinese auto folders. I was in love at first sight. Shiny, pointy, auto, COOL.
Only AR$40, something next to nothing in US dollaras. Let's say USD4.
Then I move to cheap chinese push daggers.
I have two
Then I started with boker.
Boker armed forces folders I and II, boker armed forces fixed blade tanto, boker tuff.
Then I went for muela knives. Muela is a spanish brand, well known in Argentina, 440 C steel, good finish in general.
Have the Jabali, the Bowie, the Piooner model, two short with big belly skinners.
Then the beker bk2.
Then Zt 0100 fixed blade 3v steel
Then zt 0300
Then fox pro hunter folding, micarta scales, N690co, liner lock and lawks.
Then Bechmade 741 Onslaught.
Soooooooooooooo
I feel that I've "parked" myself in what you could call a set level of knives.
Steel better than 440C or AUS8 (154, S30V, N690Co, 3v)
Locks stronger than liner lock (frame lock, liner wiht lawks, axis)
Handles better than average also (machined g10 or micarta or titanium)
Cool looking
Those qualities is what NOW I define like a "good knife". Not good as in "it fullfills it purpose as knife", but as in "in the current production and semi custom market, they are from the middle up". You have with them most of what current state of the art knife science (?) has to offer today.
I posting this because today I have red every catalog out there, been reading this and other forums for months, been talking with knowledgeable (?) people, been testing my own knives, carrying them, cut myself with them, etc.
And NOW I'm reading things like "yeah, 154cm is a serviceable steel, but SV125 it's better"
Or "M390 es good, but k390 its one order of magnitud better". I've red this last one here, in the spyderco forum, a user asking for a sprint run on them.
And I don't even know yet what m390 is, much less k390.
Sooooooooooooooo
I know this is very subjective, but I would like to hear other subjectivities: when a knife is a good knife? What qualities makes a knife more than just average?
I forsee the extreme tipical answers:
a) A buck 110 420 steel it's more than enough, because of the heat treatment and blade geometry. An average user like you would never tell the difference.
All else is marketing hype.
b) You pay what you get for.
I've detected differences, very clear differences. When you sharpen 420 on a stone, the sound the steel makes it's very different from S30V, and it's harder to sharpen S30V.
154cm has a sharper edge than anything I've been able to produce on a 420.
Where S30V chips, 154cm bends.
And so.
Rambling. Sorry.
What qualities does a knife need in your view to be considered above average?
My next purchase would be a zt0561, to try the blade shape and Elmax steel. And it would meet all of MY criteria.