The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Regardless of its material?In my opinion, metallic bonded cuts faster, but resin bonded leaves a smoother finish.
Metallic bonded stones are similar to plated in terms of feel and finish. Resin bonded are more akin to ceramics. My personal preference is resin bonded for the best combination of speed and finish quality.
Sorry, I'm not sure what "its" is referring to here.Regardless of its material?
Regardless the material of the abrasive? You mentioned only the bonding but the question was about the bonding and the material. CBN/metal vs diamond/resin. I wanted to know that how the resin bonding modifies the almost twice as hard diamond compared to the metal bonded CBN.Sorry, I'm not sure what "its" is referring to here.
So in this the metal bonded CBN should do a more agressive cut doesn't matter if CBN is "softer" than diamond?The difference between the two is chiefly a matter of grit protrusion. At equal abrasive size and type/grade, more grit protrusion = more aggressive cut but rougher finish produced while less grit protrusion = less aggressive cut but finer finish produced. Think of it like setting the depth of a planer blade.
If the grit size is the same, why would one protrude more than the other? Assuming equal flatness.The difference between the two is chiefly a matter of grit protrusion. At equal abrasive size and type/grade, more grit protrusion = more aggressive cut but rougher finish produced while less grit protrusion = less aggressive cut but finer finish produced. Think of it like setting the depth of a planer blade.
Bond type and surface treatment.If the grit size is the same, why would one protrude more than the other? Assuming equal flatness.
So in this the metal bonded CBN should do a more agressive cut doesn't matter if CBN is "softer" than diamond?
I don't think the hardness difference between diamond and CBN is material for knife sharpening as they're both much harder than any blade steel or the carbides in steel. The only time it matters is for high-speed, high-temperature grinding, where CBN is preferred because diamond reacts with iron at high temperatures, which causes the diamond to break down rapidly.Regardless the material of the abrasive? You mentioned only the bonding but the question was about the bonding and the material. CBN/metal vs diamond/resin. I wanted to know that how the resin bonding modifies the almost twice as hard diamond compared to the metal bonded CBN.
It's more that the heat destroys the diamond, no matter what is in contact with it, diamonds don't like heat.diamond reacts with iron at high temperatures, which causes the diamond to break down rapidly.
With a hard re-profile, I'll start with a 120 grit CBN metallic followed by resin bonded in 150, 240, and 400 grit.I'd like to buy a #120 metallic bonded diamond stone reprofiling the edge angle fast. Before stropping I'd buy a #4000 resin bonded CBN.
Between these two grit sized stones is it a good idea to buy a #600 metallic bonded CBN, and a #1500 resin diamond stone, or really doesn't matter too much the bond and the material.
I'd like to buy a #120 metallic bonded diamond stone reprofiling the edge angle fast. Before stropping I'd buy a #4000 resin bonded CBN.
Between these two grit sized stones is it a good idea to buy a #600 metallic bonded CBN, and a #1500 resin diamond stone, or really doesn't matter too much the bond and the material.
That's a good progression, but just so everyone knows, resin bonded stones from Venev use the FEPA grit rating system. The Japanese whetstone equivalents to Venev's 150, 240, and 400 are roughly 150, 500, and 1000.With a hard re-profile, I'll start with a 120 grit CBN metallic followed by resin bonded in 150, 240, and 400 grit.
Good to know that.That's a good progression, but just so everyone knows, resin bonded stones from Venev use the FEPA grit rating system. The Japanese whetstone equivalents to Venev's 150, 240, and 400 are roughly 150, 500, and 1000.
Yes, exactly what I'd like to do.So read most of the thread, sounds like you're just looking for a fast cutting starting progression, then a polished end result? If that's the case, no need to get so hung up on the bond type. I haven't tried metal bonded personally so I'll defer to what others say about it, which is to say, it doesn't polish as well as resin bonded. I do have lots of experience with resin bonded however and it definitely polishes well, some resin bonded are better than others though in terms of polishing. If you want fast cutting, I don't know that you need to spend the big bucks on metal bonded unless you really sharpen a ton and want it to last a very long time. A cheap diamond plate can do that job just as well if not better due to the diamonds sitting on top of the plates, so they'll be able to cut deeper. I think of diamond plates as like a gravel road and resin or metal bonded would be like asphalt and concrete respectively. One is rougher to drive on than the other two, and of the latter two one definitely lasts longer than the other.
Anyway, your grit progression after the reprofiling stone of 600/1500/4000 doesn't sound bad. Could maybe sub the 600 for a 400 for a bit more speed though imo. A lot of stone sets you can buy are something like 325-400/1000-1200/5000-6000 so your suggestion would still work fine imo. I generally don't go below a 300-400 personally for reprofiling. Something in the 120-140 range I've only used for extremely damaged edges since using abrasives that large can stress the edge a bit more than necessary and lead to chipping with some steels in my experience.
CBN maybe a better choice because diamond is more brittle.
Resin bonded will leave a finer end result, which isn't necessarily always what you may desire (depending on the purpose of the knife) but just something to note.
I think the scienceofsharp conclusion that "toothy is a myth" more of a semantics issue. All edges have teeth, but the question is the scale of them. It's more like a sliding scale of TPI like on a saw blade. A polished edge is like the equivalent of a hacksaw blade TPI whereas a coarse, aggressive slicing edge is more like a large-toothed pruning saw or crosscut for green wood.
I belived that the toothy edge is better sometimes, for example its better to use on tomato. But I read on scienceofsharp that toothy edge is a myth. The author shows some images of an electron microscope about this. All edges are toothy.