- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 1,427
Is there a distinct advantage in running a 1800 rpm 220 motor with jackshaft and pulleys in comparison to using a 3400 rpm motor with direct drive if both setups are driven through a VFD? Logic would dictate that the direct drive has a mechanical advantage and should produce more power at the drive wheel but I have heard that motor experts suggest an advantage with the 1800 rpm motor versus the 3400 rpm motor. Is this all just opinion because the motors usually cost the same amount or there really a good reason to run a slower motor? Reliability, better variable speed control, lower power consumption, or more torque...do any of these things come into play in designing a grinder? I use a 2 hp KMG with Kbac drive and it works fine. Is the polar bear grinder with the faster direct drive a better grinder in any quantifiable way? Does anyone have both types that has a preference?