I was very close to purchasing the Sharpmaker yesterday. However once adding in the UF stones it totalled a mere $80 short of the KME system.
This got me thinking...should I be spending this much money on a system that is mainly used to maintain a microbevel or main bevel on an already sharp edge?
I see the potential in the KME system, mainly in reprofiling my edges and sharpening my dull knives into very sharp knives. As for keeping my blades sharp I'm unsure if the KME is meant for that - or can even do that reasonably.
But... Let's take my Spyderco Para 3 for example which came from the factory shaving sharp. It hasn't been used to cut anything but a single sheet of paper so would I really benefit from reprofiling a knife like that?
Would I gain anything by utilizing the KME system as opposed to putting a quick microbevel on with the Sharpmaker? I read that if I went the microbevel route it would eventually become the main bevel and require reprofiling anyways...is this true? Would this suggest the KME may be the best all around option?
Touching up on the KME has me a bit concerned however. Even with accurate records and photographs of blade positioning in the clamps, is touching up on the KME more trouble than it's worth?
What's your take on these issues?
This got me thinking...should I be spending this much money on a system that is mainly used to maintain a microbevel or main bevel on an already sharp edge?
I see the potential in the KME system, mainly in reprofiling my edges and sharpening my dull knives into very sharp knives. As for keeping my blades sharp I'm unsure if the KME is meant for that - or can even do that reasonably.
But... Let's take my Spyderco Para 3 for example which came from the factory shaving sharp. It hasn't been used to cut anything but a single sheet of paper so would I really benefit from reprofiling a knife like that?
Would I gain anything by utilizing the KME system as opposed to putting a quick microbevel on with the Sharpmaker? I read that if I went the microbevel route it would eventually become the main bevel and require reprofiling anyways...is this true? Would this suggest the KME may be the best all around option?
Touching up on the KME has me a bit concerned however. Even with accurate records and photographs of blade positioning in the clamps, is touching up on the KME more trouble than it's worth?
What's your take on these issues?