- Joined
- Feb 21, 2003
- Messages
- 784
Hello. I've recently developed an interest in traditional slipjoint and lockback style knives. As such, I've gravitated towards the Buck brand, due to the reputation that their knives hold. I've also lurked around on this subforum for a while and have noticed what people have said in regards to the quality of Buck knives and to their excellent customer service. Plus the fact that the owner of the company and other 'higher ups' regularly visit is a nice personalized touch.
It was time to get my kids their first pocket knives and I went with a Trapper for the oldest and a Stockman for the middle one. The youngest insisted on a different brand, but after getting it home, the edge geometry was such that it didn't make a good cutter for him. So he will be getting a Buck knife of some sort shortly to compensate.
I had to get something to fuel the addiction as well, so I also picked up a Trapper and a Trio for myself. This was in addition to the Nobleman that I had gotten a week earlier. All are great knives and I look forward to many years of happy service.
Now, on to my question/ dilemma. Even though I have been EDC'ing both the Trapper and the Trio for the last couple of days, I want to pick up a lockback of some sort. I am aware of the high esteem that everyone has of the 110, and I think that it is a great knife. But I don't want something that requires a sheath. I want to be able to stick the knife in my pocket and not worry about it.
I have been looking at the 55, the 503, and the 501. All seem to fit the bill, as far as size, I believe. They seem pretty comparable overall. My question is this: Is the only real difference between the 55 and the 500 series knives, apart from the aesthetic brass vs. nickel bolsters and the handle material, the clip point vs. the drop point blade?
I am leaning towards the 500 series, as I prefer the drop point, but if there is some glaring issue that makes one better than the other, I would appreciate it if someone would let me know.
Thank you and I look forward to continued learning about Buck knives from all here.
It was time to get my kids their first pocket knives and I went with a Trapper for the oldest and a Stockman for the middle one. The youngest insisted on a different brand, but after getting it home, the edge geometry was such that it didn't make a good cutter for him. So he will be getting a Buck knife of some sort shortly to compensate.
I had to get something to fuel the addiction as well, so I also picked up a Trapper and a Trio for myself. This was in addition to the Nobleman that I had gotten a week earlier. All are great knives and I look forward to many years of happy service.
Now, on to my question/ dilemma. Even though I have been EDC'ing both the Trapper and the Trio for the last couple of days, I want to pick up a lockback of some sort. I am aware of the high esteem that everyone has of the 110, and I think that it is a great knife. But I don't want something that requires a sheath. I want to be able to stick the knife in my pocket and not worry about it.
I have been looking at the 55, the 503, and the 501. All seem to fit the bill, as far as size, I believe. They seem pretty comparable overall. My question is this: Is the only real difference between the 55 and the 500 series knives, apart from the aesthetic brass vs. nickel bolsters and the handle material, the clip point vs. the drop point blade?
I am leaning towards the 500 series, as I prefer the drop point, but if there is some glaring issue that makes one better than the other, I would appreciate it if someone would let me know.
Thank you and I look forward to continued learning about Buck knives from all here.