Which pack?

S

scpower

Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
74
So this was started in another thread but I would like a little advice from you guys. Out of these packs, which one do you think is better and why? I am mainly looking at the Phantom and the Gunslinger on this page...(scroll to bottom and clicky the links...

http://www.eberlestock.com/Tactical Master.htm

In addition to these packs, which I really like for the ability to pack along a rifle or fishing poles, or even both, are there any other packs you would recommend?

Thanks
 
Not one for tactical packs, but the Phantom would be my choice between the two you've chosen. They look well designed and seem to be built for rugged use.

Seems to me that the Swedish mil., or maybe another country used a similar method of carrying their weapon in the pack and if I remember correctly, Cabela's had a couple of hunting packs at one time, that did the same. It makes sense to carry an additional weapon like a snipers rifle in that manner, leaving you your main combat weapon available, but for hunting, it never made sense to carry my rifle anywhere but on my shoulder. Where it's available immediately for the shot, when needed.
 
Thats truem quick access is key. However, I think this design would be good for getting to or from the hunting grounds, or just as an option to carry a rifle to a camping area etc.

Thanks for the tip on the Swedes and the Cabalas, I will check them out.
 
I looked at Eberlestock packs in the store today and I will say they are very stout packs. You have to have the need for a tactical pack of this type because they would not make a half way decent day pack or wilderness pack. In addition the rugged construction makes them heavy. It is all in what you plan on doing with the pack.
 
Thanks for the replies. I would plan on using the pack as a BOB of sorts. It would be my main pack on trips to Alaska etc where carrying a rifle and fishing gear would be the norm. I would not be carrying a tent so there are weight savings there for sure.

I guess I really like the idea of a rugged survival pack that can hold rifles and fishing gear with ease. This company seems to produce some nice stuff, but maybe I am a bit unpractical...
 
Those packs are pretty heavy for their capacity. The Phantom is under 3000 cubic inches and weighs approx. 6lbs. Compare that to a Gregory Shasta - same weight but nearly 5000 cubic inches of capacity.

I'm sure that the Eberlestock packs are great - but tactical/military packs tend not to be too concerned with weight since their movements are largely mechanized. If your movements usually involve motorized transport, then a few pounds here or there is not going to make much difference. But if you're humping your load on your own two feet into the mountains over many miles and feet of altitude change, then every pound and ounce counts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top