-
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details: https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is$300$250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
Who has photos of the inside of the Free Rein 28 rubber handle?
- Thread starter 未知艺术家
- Start date
贯穿中心的轴始终存在这样的问题，其强度似乎值得怀疑。
Nuker
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2024
- Messages
- 787
You said:
There is always such a problem with the axis running through the center, and its strength seems to be questionable.
Response:
Did you read this post from the referenced thread? (Apparently you didn’t.)
Did you view the referenced Joe X video? (Apparently you didn’t)
I'll quote him, "This handle is super tough."
Go To 15:45.
Side note:
It can be difficult to find the motivation to participate in a discussion when questions are asked, information provided, and then the subsequent statement/response indicates information was not reviewed.
Additionally sapping motivation is when a foreign member won’t provide the effort to translate into a forum’s native language. If you want to foster participation, avoid making it cumbersome to interact.
你说：
轴线穿过中心总是存在这样的问题，其强度似乎是值得怀疑的。
回复：
您是否从引用线程中读到了这篇文章？ （显然你没有。）
您是否查看了引用的Joe X视频? （显然你没有）
我会引用他，“这个手柄非常艰难。”
去15:45。
旁注：
当提出问题，提供信息，然后随后的陈述/回答表明未审查信息时，很难找到参加讨论的动机。
此外，动机是当外国成员不提供转化为论坛的母语的努力时。如果您想培养参与，请避免使互动繁琐。
There is always such a problem with the axis running through the center, and its strength seems to be questionable.
Response:
Did you read this post from the referenced thread? (Apparently you didn’t.)
Did you view the referenced Joe X video? (Apparently you didn’t)
I'll quote him, "This handle is super tough."
Go To 15:45.
Side note:
It can be difficult to find the motivation to participate in a discussion when questions are asked, information provided, and then the subsequent statement/response indicates information was not reviewed.
Additionally sapping motivation is when a foreign member won’t provide the effort to translate into a forum’s native language. If you want to foster participation, avoid making it cumbersome to interact.
你说：
轴线穿过中心总是存在这样的问题，其强度似乎是值得怀疑的。
回复：
您是否从引用线程中读到了这篇文章？ （显然你没有。）
您是否查看了引用的Joe X视频? （显然你没有）
我会引用他，“这个手柄非常艰难。”
去15:45。
旁注：
当提出问题，提供信息，然后随后的陈述/回答表明未审查信息时，很难找到参加讨论的动机。
此外，动机是当外国成员不提供转化为论坛的母语的努力时。如果您想培养参与，请避免使互动繁琐。
Last edited: