Why do people here have such an obsession with early lock up?

Joined
Apr 8, 2012
Messages
1,123
If a liner or frame lock's well made, it should settle at one point and then just stop. So why does it matter if that point's 30% or 80% across the lock face?
 
Titanium is a soft metal and will wear over time against a hardened steel blade tang. The earlier the lockup, the more room for wear there is.
 
I think the wear factor comes into play. Another thing, on one knife I have that locks up late. It is a little more difficult to unlock.
 
Titanium is a soft metal and will wear over time against a hardened steel blade tang. The earlier the lockup, the more room for wear there is.

But people still obsess about early lockup even on steel locks. And carbidizing/carburizing/hardening/a lock face insert virtually eliminates the wear factor once the lock's worn in.
 
But people still obsess about early lockup even on steel locks. And carbidizing/carburizing/hardening/a lock face insert virtually eliminates the wear factor once the lock's worn in.

Yeah, I don't get the early lockup thing when the locks are carbidized or have a steel plate. Maybe it's just ingrained from when those improvements weren't as common. :confused:
 
Titanium is a soft metal and will wear over time against a hardened steel blade tang. The earlier the lockup, the more room for wear there is.

Good shot, Eagle. I was gonna say almost the exact same thing.

Early lockup = longer knife life.

Late lockup = shorter knife life and possible sticky lock.

Moose
 
When I make a liner lock I like the lock to be around 40-50% engagement. I've been carrying one of my custom liner lock folders for 2 yrs I have abused it but I don't see any wear yet it still locks up the same as it did the last time I put it together over 2 yrs ago. I see this question and others pop up about lock wear and early or late lock up. I personally have never had this problem with any of my production or custom knives.
 
If it's a linerlock, I prefer the entire lock face to be touching the blade tang. It "feels" safer and puts my mind at ease.

I have a John W. Smith custom with a linerlock that I have flipped open literally thousands of times (bad habit :D) and the lock has not moved at all. I'm pretty sure he carbidizes the lock face on his knives.
 
I have an old Emerson that I have abused for about 8 years, and the liner lock has gradually moved across the tang. It is now almost to the opposite side, and I will send it in for a new lock. Maybe if it had an early lock up from the start it would have lasted 15........but honestly I don't remember where it started.
 
When I make a liner lock I like the lock to be around 40-50% engagement. I've been carrying one of my custom liner lock folders for 2 yrs I have abused it but I don't see any wear yet it still locks up the same as it did the last time I put it together over 2 yrs ago. I see this question and others pop up about lock wear and early or late lock up. I personally have never had this problem with any of my production or custom knives.

This is why I posted this thread in the first place. I just don't get it.

If it's a linerlock, I prefer the entire lock face to be touching the blade tang. It "feels" safer and puts my mind at ease.

Same here.
 
hm. more room for wear and tear huh? that makes pretty good sense. glad someone else brought this up because I've been wondering the same thing for a while now
 
It's one more thing to obsess about. Remove it, and we'll just find something else.

We've gotta talk/argue about something, right?
 
It's one more thing to obsess about. Remove it, and we'll just find something else.

We've gotta talk/argue about something, right?

It's human nature to argue Nullity, some just can't help themselves
 
why don't they make a discontinuous tang surface like with the RJ martin knives? that way, the lock bar never goes past 50%.
 
Back
Top