Why I bought a Junglas

Joined
Dec 1, 2007
Messages
3,798
I wrote this post for those of you who don’t own a Junglas. Maybe you already have a bunch of analogous knives or just don’t see the point in getting one. I hope this gives you a reason to reconsider.


I have a lot of small blades, which I consider to be anything roughly 6 inches or shorter. I also have a few large blades, which I consider to be anything roughly 18 inches or longer.

I use blades in these ranges quite often. I also use saws and axes for heavy work. And I rarely find myself in a situation where I wish I had something that isn't a saw, isn't an axe, and isn't 18+ or 6- inches long.

But it happens from time to time. And when it happens I always wish I had a decent chopper. So I decided I should bite the bullet and get one.

I decided I wanted something that was light, tough, and at an easy-to-justify price.

I decided that maybe I needed to buy the Busse Bushwacker Mistress, since it seemed to meet my criteria of “tough and light.” But I would definitely get my pants pulled down over the price. And I would have to buy a carry system separately. I wasn’t looking forward to spending about $500 (circa mid-2010, destined to escalate in the near future) for a knife and a carry system only to get something with lumpy handles and one of those cursed choil cut-outs that only really work for me on a hunting knife.

I like Busse and own a few. But this clearly wasn’t one of the models I needed.

I also looked at a few other models from Becker, Saji, Bark River, Ontario, and some custom makers. None really fit the bill (wood handles and cord wrapping are no-no’s, prices weren’t right, carry systems sucked, dimensions were odd, ergonomics were awful, etc).

I decided to go with the ESEE Junglas. The moment I got it and started using it, I wondered why I didn’t just skip the whole decision process and buy this knife in the first place.

Here’s why:

1. Design

The Junglas has simple lines, no choil, handles aren’t bulky, and there are no odd grinds or a spiky pommel. The blade is a good chopper length and width, the thickness isn’t too fat or too thin, the handle is long but not unwieldy.

The ergonomics are comfortable and safe. I can use the knife without feeling like my hand will slip off the blade on a misplaced cut or up onto the blade if I hit a "snag."

2. Manufacture

It is made by Rowen. These guys know how to turn plain 1095 steel into a blade that has excellent edge retention and lateral toughness, and can be returned to razor sharpness with minimal effort. There are plenty of reviews and videos out there that will attest to this.

3. Warranty

It has the forever+1 ESEE warranty. No worries about this.

4. Carry System

Holy crap, this is a nice system. The kydex is nicely made and fits the knife perfectly (and the tightness is adjustable). The nylon attachments include a handle snap, a belt loop, an attached dangler loop, and a butt “sleeve” to protect both you and your knife. The attachments are also fully reversible for left-handed use.

5. Price

You simply aren’t going to get a knife that meets these specs, has this nice of a carry system, for a price that is modest and even borderline cheap (depending on your budget of course). I could have bought an RTAK II for about $90 and I almost did. But I paid a “premium” to get the Junglas because I knew, after paying a sheath maker to build and ship me a decent RTAK II sheath, that I would end up paying about the same price anyway, with a longer time delay, and for a knife that isn’t designed as well (in my opinion and I am guessing in the designers’ opinion as well).


While I may only use the Junglas 2-3 times per year, I know I could not have possibly picked a better tool for the occasional odd job that I will use it for. And I know that I have several hundred dollars in my pocket that I didn’t end up spending on something more expensive that won’t be any more useful to me in the short or long term.

That’s why I bought a Junglas.
 
Thanks for the review, I too am leaning towards the Junglas. I hear its not quite as thick as the esee 5, is it as thick as the rtakII? I guess I could look up specs but.............

Rob
 
Many great reasons that the Junglas is a great blade. It feels great in the hand, that is for sure. Glad to hear you are satisfied with the purchase :thumbup:
 
great post!
I wasn't quite that analytical, but considered similar choppers that you did.
BWM - sexy, but very similar specs, $350 + another $50-100 for a sheath and a long wait...
BK9 - durable, no wait, but then $40 for aftermarket scales and $50-100 for a better sheath...
RTAK II - chunky grips, less than stellar sheath, nice price.
Several customs for long waits and more $$.
and most important:
when I first saw a pic of the RC10/Junglas the first thought in my mind was "SWEET <insert deity of choice>!!! I want one!!!"
Then I started checking out all the online retailers I could find to compare preorder prices.

Will it outchop my M43 khukri? no.
is it more comfortable in my hands/leave no hot spots? Yes.
 
That's a pretty good review of your Junglas and the decision on weather to buy it or not. It really is one hell of a knife that feels absolutely great in your hand. It comes with probably the best standard sheath system out there and is backed by THE best warranty in the business. How could you go wrong?! Congrats on your new Junglas!!!
 
Regarding the queston of thickness, the Junglas is 1/16 inch thinner than the RC-5 and is the same thickness as the RC-4.

Great breakdown, 1066vik. There are certainly a lot of choppers that the Junglas cannot out-chop. But my opinion is that your intended use of the blade should determine the specs of the product you choose.

We are lucky to live in an era where there are so many options to choose from. But this has downsides as well, as anyone who has bought way too many knives or spent a month picking one out can attest.
 
I wasn't that analytical either. I was deciding on what to buy for my first ,and chose the Junglas because it looked cool and I had read so much good stuff about it. And besides, I knew that it wouldn't be my only one. I just got my RC 5 in the mail today. It's like "son of junglas". I love these knives! Now, what to get next............
 
Somehow, from reading so much about Junglas and other competitors it seems to me that it falls on how much will you use it. Actually how often.
If it's not that often than the BK9 is a steal and the handle won't be a too big issue.
If it's on a regular basis then the Junglas.
If you want sth better than 1095, and can afford it, then the Busse
 
actually, I have fairly large, wide hands and the BK scales aren't comfortable but the Junglas & ESEE6 ones are.
 
The only Esee missing for me is the Junglas. This thread is sure swaying me big-time.:)

If it's not that often than the BK9 is a steal and the handle won't be a too big issue.

That's what has been kinda holding me back. My BK9 is a great performer so far.
 
Somehow, from reading so much about Junglas and other competitors it seems to me that it falls on how much will you use it. Actually how often.
If it's not that often than the BK9 is a steal and the handle won't be a too big issue.
If it's on a regular basis then the Junglas.
If you want sth better than 1095, and can afford it, then the Busse

The Junglas for me makes a great occasional use knife. If I wanted a chopper to use every day I'd again pick the Junglas. Why? Ergonomics.

I simply cannot overemphasize how important this is. I have come very close to serious injury because of slippage, pain, or weariness. You can't afford to let this happen, so why even consider a knife with a badly designed handle?

INFI is definitely better steel than 1095, and the Busse BWM might be able to spank a Junglas in a chop-off. Maybe.

But at less than half the price, with better ergonomics and a lifetime warranty, I don't know why anyone would pick the BWM over a Junglas simply because of performance. Personal taste, definitely. But that's about it.

So if anyone is worried about 1095 quality, buy it anyway and beat it up. If it breaks, get a new one under your warranty and you're back to where you started. Then repeat.
 
Last edited:
Fantastic review!

Well planned out and really covers it all and so damn true! :D
 
The Junglas for me makes a great occasional use knife. If I wanted a chopper to use every day I'd again pick the Junglas. Why? Ergonomics.

I simply cannot overemphasize how important this is. I have come very close to serious injury because of slippage, pain, or weariness. You can't afford to let this happen, so why even consider a knife with a badly designed handle?

INFI is definitely better steel than 1095, and the Busse BWM might be able to spank a Junglas in a chop-off. Maybe.

But at less than half the price, with better ergonomics and a lifetime warranty, I don't know why anyone would pick the BWM over a Junglas simply because of performance. Personal taste, definitely. But that's about it.

So if anyone is worried about 1095 quality, buy it anyway and beat it up. If it breaks, get a new one under your warranty and you're back to where you started. Then repeat.

I agree on the BWM thing. Simply has to be personal choice.
My point with the occasional use is - if you're gonna use it maybe 2 or 3 times a year then the 60 to 70$ vs 120 to 180$ becomes a deal. But then again that's how I see it.;)
 
As I have a trunk full of choppers, I didn't need a Junglas. I just like choppers, and I must say, the Junglas is among the best I own. Rowen did this one right.
 
oh great. WHY did I click on this thread? lol!
Seriously...the ONLY reason I don't own a Junglas or a Machete from ESEE is I'm not sure I'd get enough use of it.

I have this thought process that if I'm gonna own the toughest knife family in the world...I better use them...or they will rise up and take their revenge upon me...lol!
 
Back
Top