I just read through the post by lavan complaining about how easy his fallkniven U2's blade scratches. While reading the post, I can't help thinking about this question: What good does a laminated blade do on a small knife like U2?
As to my understanding, laminating hard steel into softer steel is to make a knife hard to break while still hold a good edge. Ancient Chinese and Japanese use this technique to make long swords. But laminating on a 2" blade? I just don't get it. I think that cutting will be the only task for such a short knife, and I don't expect it will receive any strong percussion to make it necessary to laminate.
Is it because of using a whole piece of hard steel blade is more expensive than a laminated one? I don't know how much the laminate process costs compared with a whole piece of steel.
As to my understanding, laminating hard steel into softer steel is to make a knife hard to break while still hold a good edge. Ancient Chinese and Japanese use this technique to make long swords. But laminating on a 2" blade? I just don't get it. I think that cutting will be the only task for such a short knife, and I don't expect it will receive any strong percussion to make it necessary to laminate.
Is it because of using a whole piece of hard steel blade is more expensive than a laminated one? I don't know how much the laminate process costs compared with a whole piece of steel.