- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 2,172
About a month ago I picked up a Centofante 4 and after a month of carrying it, it's became my favorite blade. It really seems to perform better than some of the other blade shapes I've used.
First off the straight edge is super easy to sharpen. The way the tip is designed it punctures more easily than clip points due to the way pressure is transfered to the tip. The tip shape also allows for better control in detailed cutting. Also the lack of a belly keeps items from sliding of the blade before it's fully cut.
Honestly to me it's one of the least sexy looking blade designs. I picked it up out of curiosity and for want of a Spyderco (other than my Spyderfly), but it has quickly established a dominate place as my primary EDC.
So, does anyone have any insight as to why there are so few knives produced with a Wharncliffe style blade? Other than a couple of designs from Spyderco and Kershaw, and one discontinued patter from BM I know of no other Wharncliffe knives.
First off the straight edge is super easy to sharpen. The way the tip is designed it punctures more easily than clip points due to the way pressure is transfered to the tip. The tip shape also allows for better control in detailed cutting. Also the lack of a belly keeps items from sliding of the blade before it's fully cut.
Honestly to me it's one of the least sexy looking blade designs. I picked it up out of curiosity and for want of a Spyderco (other than my Spyderfly), but it has quickly established a dominate place as my primary EDC.
So, does anyone have any insight as to why there are so few knives produced with a Wharncliffe style blade? Other than a couple of designs from Spyderco and Kershaw, and one discontinued patter from BM I know of no other Wharncliffe knives.