Nerve issues have made regular sharpening a challenge. So I finally broke down and bought a KME. I got the deluxe kit because "why not". I knew I'd use the diamond stones for my knives in D2, 9Cr18Mov, and M390. Then I got to thinking, why wouldn't I just use the diamond stones for all my knives? It ought to save time if nothing else.
So help me out. Is there a good reason to use the ceramic stones?
If you like the edges you get from using diamond, there's really no reason not to use them. Also, diamond cuts & removes metal efficiently at a lighter touch. It's about > 3X as hard as most ceramic grits, which means it'll cut as deeply with about 1/3rd of the pressure used for other grit types. Light touch is a good thing for finishing, and will also reduce pain & fatigue in your hands if you have issues with that.
As to the argument that diamond is too aggressive for simpler steels, the fix is easy. Use a
finer grit of diamond for jobs on simpler steels that ordinarily might want for something coarser in other stone types. Anything from Fine (600) through EF (1200) in diamond can leave great working edges on simpler steels for which you might otherwise use a 320 - 400 stone of another grit type, like aluminum oxide or silicon carbide. For example, in small blades of mine in simple steels, like pocketknives in 1095, CV, 420HC, etc., I'd likely be using something no more coarse than 600-mesh (DMT) for those, even for reprofiling. In other stone types, I'd be finishing with something like a Fine India stone (320-360), for the same blades.
Diamond will usually leave edges cleaner (of burrs) than most ceramics will. Burring issues are most of the reason I don't use ceramics much anymore, except for very, very light touch-ups here & there.