No Sam, you're not crazy.
You feel that way because the Victorinox soldier is most likely one of the most rugged pocket knives on the face of the earth, because it was actually designed to be that. Now I carried a Buck stockman for a very long time, and I can give honest testimony to how it was a very good quality rugged pocket knife under hard conditions. But... it was not in a class with the Victorinox. It held a cutting edge a bit better, and had three different blade shaped to choose from. But the all buisness metal construction of the soldier, plus the tools, give it a more all around versitility. Plus with the screw driver blade being shaped the way it is to handle lateral stress a bit better than the shape of the screw driver on the army scout or "demo" knife, it can be used for light prying better than one of the knife blades on the stockman. The soldier also uses spun rivits instead of peened, if that makes a difference, and according to the Swiss it does.
Also the soldier is built to actual Swiss Army specs, that call for the blade to be rockwelled at 56. Not 57 or 55, but right at 56. Swiss presision I suppose. This may seem a little soft by our standards of the latest and greatest knife that can skin 15 elk and still dry shave a three day old beard like a new Bic razor, but think about it. At 56 it will hold a good edge for a decent amount of time. It will stand up to an idiot abusing his blade for things like prying, even though he has a screwdriver blade for that. The U.S. army did a survey while I was in on how a soldier uses a knife. It was started by the engineers at Camillus when they were making the MK2, also called mistakingly the K-bar. It was found that soldiers used the knife for prying off the steel bands on the ammo boxes and large bulk boxes of C-rations.
The swiss aparently did a similar survey and found out the most common cause of blade breakage among troops was prying something. So they make the soldier blade a tad softer to flex and bend more than it would if it were a bit higher on the Rc scale. If you look down at the spine of the soldier you will see a distal taper drop forged into the blade. This also aids in flex toward the tip to discourage breaking. Also they found a big complaint was that soldiers did not want to spend alot of time sharpening a knife. The wanted to be able to touch up a blade in a few minutes and go. Thus you get a sak that cuts well, holds a decent working edge for a reasonable time, and re-sharpens easy, and is built to take abuse from the troops who are NOT knife knuts thus don't care abot thier knives like we do.
Now spoiled American knife knuts will cry that 56 is too soft. Think about this- an averidge machette will be high 40's range, a power mower blade will be in the 40's, the old carbon steel butcher knife blades by Old Hickory will be in the low to mid 50's. Look at how much cutting is done by those Tramontia machette's with just a touch up with a mill smooth file now and then. So in the real world where you are not trying for a record number of deer dressed out between sharpenings, or bragging rights for advertising hype, 56RC makes a very nice usable blade for pocket carry.
Your soldier will stand up for hard use and some abuse that will have your Buck on the way back to Buck for repair.
I like to think that a soldier is the 1960's VW beatle of knives. Run the dog p--s out of it, abuse it, punish it, and it still keeps on keeping on. I had a couple of those old bugs, and they were like a cockroach, very hard to kill, like an old Smith and Wesson model 10 and a sak soldier.
If you're crazy Sam, its crazy like a fox!