The two contenders:
Boker: http://www.boker.de/us/fixed-blade-knife/boker-arbolito/02BA303G.html
AlMar: http://www.almarknives.com/product/sere-operator/
These knives are very similar, both are five inches long and have similar blade profiles. They also both weigh about the same amount at 5.7oz/6oz.
Price (Boker): Boker is 1/3 of the price of the AlMar (street price).
Sheath (Boker): The AlMar sheath is just pathetic for such an expensive price it is also the primary reason why I haven't bought it yet. I just don't want to get a custom sheath, too much trouble. The Boker has a nice leather sheath.
Form (Boker): WoW. The Boker is beautiful. The AlMar is just plain/all function. The wood handle on the Boker is just gorgeous.
Edit: The Boker is about 5mm thick. The AlMar is only 3.5 mm thick. I wonder how this effects balance. They probably feel different in hand.
Function: Equal.
Finish: While the AlMar is made in Japan and I know the quality produced there, the Boker is made in south america (I have a couple of knives from there and am happy). Boker does consider the South American made knives to deserve the treebrand, maybe this implies made in Germany like fit and finish.
Steel (AlMar): The AlMar has VG10. The Boker has Bohler 695 which is 440C from my research. I didn't think I would buy another high end blade in 440C, but I might be wrong.
It seems like the only thing the AlMar has going for it is the steel. Now I have used 440C before. Yes, it is inferior to VG10. No, it hasn't let me down before. Am I too fixated on the steel, have I become to much of a steel snob? What would you pick and why? Please also mention if you are familiar with both or one of the steels mentioned.
Thanks
Boker: http://www.boker.de/us/fixed-blade-knife/boker-arbolito/02BA303G.html
AlMar: http://www.almarknives.com/product/sere-operator/
These knives are very similar, both are five inches long and have similar blade profiles. They also both weigh about the same amount at 5.7oz/6oz.
Price (Boker): Boker is 1/3 of the price of the AlMar (street price).
Sheath (Boker): The AlMar sheath is just pathetic for such an expensive price it is also the primary reason why I haven't bought it yet. I just don't want to get a custom sheath, too much trouble. The Boker has a nice leather sheath.
Form (Boker): WoW. The Boker is beautiful. The AlMar is just plain/all function. The wood handle on the Boker is just gorgeous.
Edit: The Boker is about 5mm thick. The AlMar is only 3.5 mm thick. I wonder how this effects balance. They probably feel different in hand.
Function: Equal.
Finish: While the AlMar is made in Japan and I know the quality produced there, the Boker is made in south america (I have a couple of knives from there and am happy). Boker does consider the South American made knives to deserve the treebrand, maybe this implies made in Germany like fit and finish.
Steel (AlMar): The AlMar has VG10. The Boker has Bohler 695 which is 440C from my research. I didn't think I would buy another high end blade in 440C, but I might be wrong.
It seems like the only thing the AlMar has going for it is the steel. Now I have used 440C before. Yes, it is inferior to VG10. No, it hasn't let me down before. Am I too fixated on the steel, have I become to much of a steel snob? What would you pick and why? Please also mention if you are familiar with both or one of the steels mentioned.
Thanks